reply to post by argentus
Here is at least one article, please do your own research as the facts back up my statements about GB... You can find plenty of comments from GB
calling Ron Paul, Ron Paul Supports and 9/11 Truthers Domestic Terriorist...
Nov 14, 2007.
Glenn Beck Deems Ron Paul “Domestic Threat”
Hired propagandist and corporate media shill, Glenn Beck, had Jonathan Sandys, great-grandson of Winston Churchill, and the neocon and former Marxist
David Horowitz on his show to attack Ron Paul, or more accurately the “fringe elements” that support Paul.
Horowitz, typically mired in the 1960s, completely mischaracterized the underlying dynamic of the movement, drawing anachronous comparisons between
antiwar radicals of the so-called “New Left” back in the day with Muslims and the diversified antiwar movement of today. Horowitz, with his
Marxist conditioning, insisted on lumping these two elements together and for obvious reasons — demonizing Paul supporters becomes an easier, albeit
intellectually lazy and disingenuous effort.
Beck fine tuned Horowitz’s mischaracterization. “Let me take it back the other way, David,” he averred, “it’s not just the Left this time,
it’s also the Right. Ron Paul’s supporters are also on the Right.” Horowitz agreed and specifically attacked Lew Rockwell, declaring the
Libertarians as “indistinguishable from the anti-American Left these days” and insisting they are “totally in bed with the Islamo-fascists,”
in other words they are terrorists.
Jonathan Sandys lamented the loss of “traditional values,” that is to say it is no longer quite so easy to bamboozle the public and march them off
to war, as our rulers are accustomed.
Beck concluded his segment by declaring the “Ron Paul Revolution” is “meant as a catchy slogan, but I fear some of his fringe supporters are
taking the word ‘revolution’ to literally,” sort of like the founders took the word literally and acted upon it. Beck and his corporate handlers
are concerned because, indeed, the Ron Paul Revolution is far more than a simple slogan and Paul supporters fully intend to clean out the corporate
infested whorehouse in the District of Criminals and return America to a nation based on constitutional principles.
“As the Ron Paul movement grew, it was inevitable that the neocons would turn from demeaning to smearing,” writes Lew Rockwell on the LRC blog.
“One clownish and sinister example was Glenn Beck’s CNN show last night.”
Beck actually said that the US military may have to be used against the growing threat of domestic terrorism: Ron Paul donors. Why? Because there is a
“rising tide of disenfranchisement” (sic) and Ron’s volunteers raised $4.3 million in one day “to commemorate Guy Fawkes” in a “money
bomb.” Of course, no American knows anything about the English Catholic rebel of four centuries ago. The donors were referencing the movie and
graphic novel, V for Vendetta.
Then Beck says he [is] a libertarian in his heart and it’s OK to raise money anyway you want, so long as you are not “blowing people up.” This
from a guy who advocates blowing people up every day, so long as they’re Arabs.
Then comes a plummy Brit who I think is one of Bertie Wooster’s friends from the Drones Club. Then Beck gets to the real point: we are a right-wing
peace movement. And being for peace means you want to kill people, whereas being for war means you want peace, if I may distill the agitprop.
It should be obvious by now that there is indeed a concerted effort to go after the “fringe element,” that is to say patriotic Americans who want
to put an end to endless neocon wars advocated by the likes of washed-up Marxists and former Trotskyites—or as the patriotic American, Paul Craig
Roberts, calls them, “the Jacobins in the Bush administration”—and return America to a constitutional republic.
I stand by my posting and statements!