You think the bureaucracy is bad in the U.S.? This will make you shake your head., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 5-6-2009 @ 09:48 AM by intrepid
If British Columbia sounds like the land that common sense forgot when it comes to human rights, there’s good reason. Many of the most ridiculous case studies discussed in this book originate in that province.

Take, for instance, the time the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal declared that a McDonald’s restaurant employee had the human right not to wash her hands, even when she worked in the kitchen, and instead should be accommodated by finding her another job in the organization where handwashing was not essential. In theory this makes sense; but in practice, McDonald’s, who ought to know, say that there aren’t any positions that don’t require handwashing.

Beena Datt was a McDonald’s employee who claimed she’d developed a skin condition that prevented her from washing her hands in compliance with McDonald’s hygiene policy. That’s the same hygiene policy that has helped turn McDonald’s into a fast-food market leader here in the West and an embassy for Westerners travelling overseas. When you’re in a Third World country and tired of eating in hygiene-challenged local restaurants, you can count on a Western standard of cleanliness at McDonald’s.


www2.macleans.ca...

MacDonald's tried to accomodate her but there were no positions that didn't require hand washing. They paid her for 2.5 years in an attempt to keep her. In the end there was nothing they could do. That's damn generous imo.

So what does Datt do after her paid 2 and a half year vacation? She sues MacDonalds AND WINS!!!! The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal(BCHRT) awarded her $50,000 stating that the employer had violated her "dignityn and self respect". Again.....

Damn ridiculous. Now here's the kicker:

What would happen if, heaven forbid, someone contracted a disease from McDonald’s food because of this insane order? Could the victim sue the restaurant for failing to live up to its legal public health requirements, even though McDonald’s wanted to do so? Could the BCHRT itself be sued? What if it wasn’t just one customer who got an upset stomach, but a dozen people dying from E. coli? And why do we have to play such a risky game in any case, when the science behind food hygiene is settled?


This is about as sad as it can get.


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 10:41 AM by DrumsRfun
reply to post by kommunist


For me the fact they gave Mahar Arar 10 million for his ordeal and gave David Milgaard 3 million is absolutely insane.
A good ole innocent Canadian boy compared to a guy who is from another country with suspected terrorist ties.
Makes no sense to me.Its actually pretty disgusting in my opinion.


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 10:53 AM by kiwifoot
reply to post by intrepid


That is mad!

I have a story from the UK that I think will make you chuckle.

Not quite in the OP's league but anyway:

When I moved here from NZ about 11 years ago I had to apply for a National Insurance Numbers, kind of like a SS number in the US.

So I made the appointment and waited for 3 hours in line. I had all the paperwork and everything, gave them in and answered a few questions. One of the questions was "Have you ever left the UK and returned, if yes please give details in the box below?"

Well I left the UK when I was 6, living in several countries in Asia, Africa and Australasia, travelling to and fro until the point of my moving back to the UK. So the answer was huge, and I needed a full piece of paper to get it all down.

Anyway I gave the nice woman my forms and went on my way, expecting to wait the 3-4 weeks for my card and number.

9 MONTHS! later I recieve a letter saying there's a problem with my application, so I go to my next appointment and am absolutely gobsmacked when told the problem was the extra information on the paper I handed in (which was given to me by the lady and taken by her) did not have a BOX around it, so was not VALID!

I almost fell off my chair, so I had to witness the new person draw a box around my writing, then I had to countersign it, then 6 months later I got my number!

Amazing!

Good ol' UK!

[edit on 5-6-2009 by kiwifoot]


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 10:56 AM by sugarmonkey
reply to post by intrepid


This not only made me shake my head, it made me throw up a little bit...


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 05:24 PM by Grey Magic
reply to post by marg6043


I wish I could give you more than one star marg6043.

But I have a feeling that more will follow this one.


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 07:30 PM by StellarX
Well i see plenty of people leaping to conclusions so perhaps it should be added that she developed a skin condition of working at MacDonald's for 23 years; perhaps because of being forced to wash her hands with strong detergent ( if someone wants a research project )?

As i understand she got this 'reward' because MacDonald's used her disability to rob her of the benefits as well as trough lost wages when they refused to accommodate her skin condition ( From reading the document it looks to me like she did her best to keep washing her hands) by giving her one of the positions that would not require washing of hands and were within in prior experience range.

www2.canada.com...

And the the ruling document :

www.lancasterhouse.com...

Basically this looks to be a clear cut case of the 'law' siding with a victim who were discarded ( after almost 25 years) having worked loyally for a very long time. If only we could get Americans , and apparently some Canadians, to understand that 'rugged' individualism best serves to divide us, massively profiting corporations ( why pay her any benefits if you can get rid of her before retirement?), we would all be better off but here we are and forced to again watch the chest pounding defense of "survival of the fittest"( hand washers??) dogma.

Sad.

Stellar



reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 07:56 PM by marg6043
reply to post by StellarX


Thanks GreyMagic, now Stellar, still rather than complain about her "condition" I still think that she could have been able to wear gloves to handle food whenever it was required.

I wonder if she was given this choice.

Still I have to agree with Intrepid, when you work in the food service you have to follow the company you work with sanitation regulations.

Now if the company was trying to get rid of her to rob her of her retirement rights after 25 years then the judge could have been able to use another way to get her rewarded for her loyalties, but getting a court rule that wasn't clear enough will open the door for any free loaders to do as they wish just to get a buck out of the company.



[edit on 5-6-2009 by marg6043]


reply posted on 5-6-2009 @ 08:15 PM by habfan1968
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by StellarX


Thanks GreyMagic, now Stellar, still rather than complain about her "condition" I still think that she could have been able to wear gloves to handle food whenever it was required.

I wonder if she was given this choice.

Still I have to agree with Intrepid, when you work in the food service you have to follow the company you work with sanitation regulations.

Now if the company was trying to get rid of her to rob her of her retirement rights after 25 years then the judge could have been able to use another way to get her rewarded for her loyalties, but getting a court rule that wasn't clear enough will open the door for any free loaders to do as they wish just to get a buck out of the company.



[edit on 5-6-2009 by marg6043]


It is actually required to wear glove while handling food in a restaurant.

Why is she not wearing gloves in the first place?

Edit to add - not knowing the details of the case however i would bet the person has been working there for less than 2 years.

[edit on 5-6-2009 by habfan1968]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 30 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags