It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A batch of raw footage from decades-old NASA missions shows zipping lights and strange objects in the sky.
Recently posted on YouTube, the clips are renewing UFO conspiracy theories that the government is hiding knowledge about its interactions with intelligent life.
But two astronauts dispute that — and talk about NASA's supposed cover-up and what the clips really show.
Recently posted on YouTube, the clips are renewing UFO conspiracy theories that the government is hiding knowledge about its interactions with intelligent life.
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
They just admitted to magnetic propulsion in this article. Outside of that they haven't described the the biggest UFO evidence known as the tether incident.
Originally posted by cmazzagatti
Thats ridiculous. How typical of Faux News. Does it really matter though? The only people who are going to read that on there (besides us) are the ones who are already hopelessly manipulated by the mass media machines.
The Air Force has abandoned top-secret testing at its once most secret test site. We know why and we know where they moved it to.
Originally posted by contemplator
"Houston, this is discovery. We still have the alien spacecraft under observance"
Pretty shocking. Damning evidence that NASA are traitors to Humanity.
Originally posted by contemplator
"Houston, this is discovery. We still have the alien spacecraft under observance"
Pretty shocking. Damning evidence that NASA are traitors to Humanity.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by contemplator
"Houston, this is discovery. We still have the alien spacecraft under observance"
Pretty shocking. Damning evidence that NASA are traitors to Humanity.
Shocking indeed, that this ham operator's prank, long ago refuted even by the man who originally publicized it (Don Ratsch), should still infect your brain and elicit such venom. Why are you so helpless in the face of these UFO frauds, and why will you so strongly defend those who have deceived you into this sad state of mind?
--------------------------------------------------
"Houston, We still have the alien spacecraft...."
--------------------------------------------------
On 3-13-89, the NASA Space Shuttle "Discovery" was launched at approximately 1000 hours. About 20 hours 35 minutes into the mission, an amateur radio buff in Ohio, USA picked up a "raw" transmission which indicated that there was some type of problem or anomaly that warranted the Discovery to issue this statement; "We have a fire."
Supposedly this was a type of code for Houston to switch to a different frequency, or a code for the sighting of a UFO. There was a NASA select channel which edited shuttle transmissions before they were heard by media requesting the information. Some radio operators were able to forego this filtering and pick up "raw," unedited data.
Subsequently, at precisely 0642 hours, EDT, the amazing message, "HOUSTON, THIS IS DISCOVERY, WE STILL HAVE THE ALIEN SPACECRAFT UNDER OBSERVANCE," was heard.
A text transcription of the transmission:
WA3NAN: We are retransmitting the Space Shuttle air/ground communication.
"This is WA3NAN."
Astronaut James F. Buchli, "Houston, this is Discovery, we still have the alien spacecraft... under observance..."
In Baltimore, Maryland, Donald Ratsch, a member of the Goddard Amateur Radio Club, recorded the transmission on his Radio Shack radio. The Goddard Club monitored the NASA communications, and subsequent investigation proved that hams were receiving "raw" transmissions.
The "official" transmission, which first was filtered through Houston, does not, of course, include this statement. There is a blank space instead. There was also an allegation that immediately after the transmission, NASA instructed the crew to switch to a secure mode.
The tape, about 38 seconds long, was soon in the hands of the media, and first broadcast on LBC (London Broadcasting Company) The female voice on the tape is a news broadcaster from the LBC, and the tape as you hear it, repeats the actual transmission several times. The statement was only made once, but repeated for convenience sake; not having to restart over and over again.
For quite some time, NASA denied the very existence of the tape, but eventually did admit that it did, indeed, possess it. However, NASA spokesman James Hatfield says that the astonishing statement was a hoax, and inserted by person or persons not affiliated with NASA.
--------------------------------------------------
"Houston, We still have the alien spacecraft...."
--------------------------------------------------
On 3-13-89, the NASA Space Shuttle "Discovery" was launched at approximately 1000 hours. About 20 hours 35 minutes into the mission, an amateur radio buff in Ohio, USA picked up a "raw" transmission which indicated that there was some type of problem or anomaly that warranted the Discovery to issue this statement; "We have a fire."
Supposedly this was a type of code for Houston to switch to a different frequency, or a code for the sighting of a UFO. There was a NASA select channel which edited shuttle transmissions before they were heard by media requesting the information. Some radio operators were able to forego this filtering and pick up "raw," unedited data.
The "official" transmission, which first was filtered through Houston, does not, of course, include this statement. There is a blank space instead. There was also an allegation that immediately after the transmission, NASA instructed the crew to switch to a secure mode.
...For quite some time, NASA denied the very existence of the tape, but eventually did admit that it did, indeed, possess it. However, NASA spokesman James Hatfield says that the astonishing statement was a hoax, and inserted by person or persons not affiliated with NASA.
Originally posted by Malcram
But again, my point was and is that it's an opinion that this is a "ham radio operators prank". It's not a proven fact. Acknowledgement of this is something you seem to feel the need to omit.