I decided it best to confine this to a new post, rather than bump year-old+ topics.
Background: Following an observation that many of the aircraft designed for sustained supersonic flight (F-104, B-1, B-47, etc) had their horizontal
stabilizers mounted above the root of the vertical stabilizer, I decided to do some more research into supersonic flight design concerns and history
to see why this might be. I then stumbled across a very interesting paper that made me instantly realize why the F-23 was designed with such an
awkward wing design.
aero.stanford.edu... - This is a PDF
The directly-relevant discussion begins on page 13 of the .pdf; though the prior is also an interesting bit of reading and/or photo/graph browsing (a
diagram and a graph are worth more than a book of technical descriptions, in my opinion....).
The observant among us will quickly take note of the similarity between this design and the wing design of the YF-23.
The paper pretty much explains why this wing design is superior for practical sustained supersonic flight - I'll let it do the explaining.
However, when it comes to building a bomber with super-cruise capabilities, the wing was shown to reduce the effects of supersonic overpressure (sonic
boom), have a much better tolerance for structural stresses (reduce maintenance concerns), and has much more volume for fuel while providing a
lower-drag surface with higher lift potential.
The design also has particular advantages in when reducing the radar cross section of an aircraft. The following article will go into much more
detail about LO design concerns.
www.qsl.net...
The bottom Line:
I found this article particularly interesting with regards to the Interim Bomber competition and the rumors about the F/B-23. It would appear
Northrop-Grumman has a very stable base to create a supercruise-capable strike/bomber platform from - especially with regards to range and fuel
efficiency.
Even though the Interim Bomber competition has dropped the supercruise requirement..... a design that is designed to peak in performance at high
subsonic and supersonic speeds and has supercruise as a bonus with no adverse impact on cost.... If Northrop-Grumman can put theory into
practicality.... they will likely be sitting pretty in the Interim Bomber competition.