posted on May, 11 2009 @ 08:51 AM
Well it's kinda like if I decide to charge you with, say, assault and battery in Washington on July 4th, and you can prove to the court you was home
in Arkansus scoffing turkey 'n pumpkin pie with your folks, well would you think it was fair to have to travel to Washington and answer a civil case
and pay some lawyer a fortune when there was no proof against you, just the word of a trouble-maker?
I bet you'd be glad the court had the sense to throw the case out for lack of evidence instead.
Happens all the time, people try to bring cases for no good reason, with no proof. Even the cops can't get away with that. They have to prove there
is a case to answer before any judge will schedule a court case.
Berg had his chance to show two courts what he'd got at the pre-hearings or whatever they call it, and he didn't have one shred of evidence, just a
handful of silly bulldust. So the cases were not heard, simple as that.
Obama never answered the case because the judges determined there was no case to answer.