It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Some basic principles of physics and astronomy have been cast into doubt by new research involving scientists in Australia and Europe.
The researchers, including Dr Helmut Jerjen of the Australian National University, studied dwarf galaxies orbiting the Milky Way.
They found the galaxies were not uniformly spread around, as predicted by the so-called dark matter theory.
"They are forming some sort of disc in the sky," Dr Jerjen said.
au.news.yahoo.com...
I think this points to a Holographic universe and Mind is all that exists.
The article goes on to say:
Dr Jerjen told AAP his observations, taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and interpreted in cooperation with astrophysicists at the universities of Bonn and Vienna, did not necessarily mean the theory should be abandoned.
"I wouldn't like to say the dark matter doesn't exist," he said.
But the alternative is even more radical - abandoning Newton's theory of gravitation.
"A possible solution to this contradiction would be to reject Newton's classical theory of gravitation," Dr Jerjen said.
"If this is true, then our observations could be explained without dark matter. This conclusion has far-reaching consequences for fundamental physics and for cosmological theories."
One possible consequence of modifying gravitation theory could be that black holes do not exist.
Black holes are predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity, which already explains some astronomical observations not predicted by classical Newtonian theory.
But Dr Jerjen said modifications of Newton's theory, which is still commonly used by astronomers, would also imply changes to Einstein's theory.
The changes could mean that space-time around super-massive astronomical objects does not have the "singularity" which prevents light escaping from them.
So they may not be as black as they have been painted.
Recent measurements (c. 2001) by a number of ground-based and balloon-based experiments, including MAT/TOCO, Boomerang, Maxima, and DASI, have shown that the brightest spots are about 1 degree across. Thus the universe was known to be flat to within about 15% accuracy prior to the WMAP results. WMAP has confirmed this result with very high accuracy and precision. We now know that the universe is flat with only a 2% margin of error.
map.gsfc.nasa.gov...
A possible solution to this contradiction would be to reject Newton's classical theory of gravitation," Dr Jerjen said.
The researchers, including Dr Helmut Jerjen of the Australian National University, studied dwarf galaxies orbiting the Milky Way.
Originally posted by tobiascore
Don't worry guys. The old mechanical view of the universe will work SOMEDAY. Just stop asking questions and let science pretend it's NOT a dog chasing its own tail.
The simple solution is "out there" DOES NOT FUNDAMENTALLY exist. But somehow science is hellbent on making the objective universe a fact, even if it means making up the most insane illogical assumptions.
[edit on 9-5-2009 by tobiascore]
Originally posted by platosallegory
This is a new article that might change things.
Some basic principles of physics and astronomy have been cast into doubt by new research involving scientists in Australia and Europe.
The researchers, including Dr Helmut Jerjen of the Australian National University, studied dwarf galaxies orbiting the Milky Way.
They found the galaxies were not uniformly spread around, as predicted by the so-called dark matter theory.
"They are forming some sort of disc in the sky," Dr Jerjen said.
au.news.yahoo.com...
I think this points to a Holographic universe and Mind is all that exists.
The article goes on to say:
Dr Jerjen told AAP his observations, taken from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and interpreted in cooperation with astrophysicists at the universities of Bonn and Vienna, did not necessarily mean the theory should be abandoned.
"I wouldn't like to say the dark matter doesn't exist," he said.
But the alternative is even more radical - abandoning Newton's theory of gravitation.
"A possible solution to this contradiction would be to reject Newton's classical theory of gravitation," Dr Jerjen said.
"If this is true, then our observations could be explained without dark matter. This conclusion has far-reaching consequences for fundamental physics and for cosmological theories."
One possible consequence of modifying gravitation theory could be that black holes do not exist.
Black holes are predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity, which already explains some astronomical observations not predicted by classical Newtonian theory.
But Dr Jerjen said modifications of Newton's theory, which is still commonly used by astronomers, would also imply changes to Einstein's theory.
All I can say is that there is a lot of subjectivity in the OP's post. I don't see where you get the "evidence" that we are part of a matrix. The universe is SOOOOOOOO HUGE I don't think you understand. These are 3 -5 dwarf galaxies around us and millions on millions of galaxies around us.
Look at a picture of the Hubble Deep Field or the new one that came out.. don't remember what its called. And realize that all those lights are galaxies, the picture frame is the size of a dime held of to the night sky.
-Rhombus24
Originally posted by Saurus
Measurements of motion at that distance are not possible in such a short time as a human lifetime, and even if they were, it would be impossible to say conclusively that they were orbiting the galaxy, and not just moving past, since measurement of a change in direction at that distance is most certainly impossible.
The only reason they can possibly assume that the galaxies are orbiting the Milky Way is because they know 'it must be so because of gravity'.
If gravity were wrong, then so is their assumption that the dwarf galaxies are in orbit.
They have used a logical fallacy, where a true conclusion implies an incorrect premise. Therefore, logically, the researchers must be wrong.