reply to post by cosmicpixie
I am sorry for misunderstanding your OP on the subject of the conjunction of Neptune and Jupiter. The first signs of the pandemic were already
in Spring 1918. It is not my intention to misinterpret you deliberately...
I posted the same in the other thread on World Ages.
Certainly I do not mean to attack you personally. Conjunction in 1918 was my misunderstanding, thus I retract the word "unprofessional."
You are free to contradict my approach, in fact I highly encourage you to do so, but please refrain from personal attacks and exaggeration.
You did write this though:
Quote from cosmicpixie: "There will be no "death of science" with the Age of Aquarius making it's official entrance 21-12-2012..." Quote ends
I maintain that in the light of comparing many systems your interpretation would be correct for Aquarius, however, the timing you have learned is not.
I detail that in the other thread.
All in all, what you write may be true, since we do have very significant oppositions several times in 2008-2010. Plus, Uranus was in Aquarius in
sidereal counting for years. It just changed signs.
I am not saying one system of astrology is great and the other is bad. I was aware of the fact that you practiced Western interpretation very
skilfully and deeply and were searching for answers, from reading your text. However, since professional Western tropical astrology does not need to
establish the boundaries of a sidereal zodiac, there are astrologers who simply have not researched what World Ages were based upon... That is what is
misleading, not your research.
Most people who started to look for World Ages in the early 20th century just recently heard about precession back then, and did not know where to put
the Age of Aquarius initially. (In meaning, it is clear why great early-20th century writers related the Age of Pisces to Christianity though.)
You may simply not have been exposed to the reasoning behind. But your thread is a mundane topic, and you asserted that the Age of Aquarius would
start in 2012. You are welcome to argue for that - I posted my explanations and a recap of Jenkins's theories in the other thread. I want to clear up
all misunderstanding on how they come about. And, I would like for you to say a few words about a Western analysis of 2012 dec 21 sunrise either here
or in the other thread. I already posted my apologies and request for your input there too.

