Originally posted by tide88
So in summary:
1. Why weaponize something you yourself wouldnt be protected from?
2. What about all those other pandemics? Were they man made too? If not, why are so many people so sure this one is?
3. Scientists for the past 20 years have been saying we are long overdue for a pandemic. It was bound to happen at some point and is purely the doing of mother nature.
I will address these in reverse order.
3) Yes, scientists say we are overdue for a pandemic. While this is a true statement (some scientist do make that claim), it may or may not be accurate. Either way, it is not a good argument against the idea this could be man-made virus. Both things could be true.
All you have done is point out the consensus reality, namely that many people believed that mankind is over due for a pandemic. This only proves people believe what they told and nothing more. Think about it, if a criminal group had a "weaponized virus" (and the motive) would they use the people's belief (consenus reality) as a cover? Of course they would!
So then, let's say I agree this is NOT a weapon. It could still be used LIKE a weapon in that the (natural and predicted) crisis is being exploited for political reasons. In this sense every crisis IS a weapon, just as Rahm Emanuel, said, "... never lets a a good crisis go to waste." I think this is yet another example of what Naomi Klein called "disaster capitalism" in her book The Shock Doctrine.
2. What about all those other pandemics? Were they man made too? If not, why are so many people so sure this one is?
In the last swine flu outbreak (of 1976) the vaccine was the real killer. Was the vaccine made made? Yes, and we have Donald Rumsfeld to thank for that one (google it). It is also interesting to note the outbreak started on a military base after a forced vaccination of soldiers. Some claim this was also true for the Spanish Flu in 1918 (see www.whale.to...).
A lot of people are saying it’s possible that both in the past and now the virus(s) in question were concocted in a lab and then dispatched with the intention of creating a pandemic. If you're intellectually honest, you must admit that this is possible (however unlikely you may think it to be).
I must point out, this isn't the first time that a virus was manipulated for this purpose. For instance, in 2006 investigators discovered that a major pharmaceutical company knowingly dumped HIV-tainted drugs for hemophiliacs onto European, Asian and Latin American markets. Then there is the more recent Baxter case (google it).
Back in 1976 Dr. Ron Paul said the 'swine flu' scare was over-blown and he was proven right that time. Dr. Paul has made similar statement again this time, but I think even he would agree that this time is different.... this time the threat to our liberty (in the form of marital law) is a 1000 times greater than it was in 1976.
Why? Because this time the globalist are making their move to consolidate power. We are facing a criminal banker elite who are pushing hard to create a new world order (i.e., a global system governance, that will centralize power and create a new reserve currency for the whole world). Under these conditions, a pandemic (or mere fear of pandemic) can be used to further their agenda.
In the end, it doesn't matter if you believe 9/11 was an inside job or not. Nor does it matter if you think the derivatives bubble was a plan demolition of our economy. Nor does it matter if you believe this "swine flu" is a manufactiure bio-weapon. These are all moot questions when you look at the big picture. The questions we should be asking are, 1) "How will event X help the globalist push forward their agenda?" and, 2) "How will that impact my freedom and the liberty of future generations?"
1. Why weaponize something you yourself wouldnt be protected from?
The real killer is not the flu, but the vaccination.
RECLAIM.org
[edit on 1-5-2009 by wasaka]
