It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by allclear
is there anyone on this board with the expertise necessary to explain what one should do to subvert this virus? I was thinking about reloading my OS and all other programs, which should negate any conficker virus...right?
sorry, didn't want to read through pages of amateurish solutions... no offense. Sometimes getting an answer is like searching for a needle in a haystack.
Originally posted by madmangunradio
Just google conficker stealing data and you'll find endless links talking about it.
"The latest version of Kido also downloads Email-Worm.Win32.Iksmas.atz to infected systems. This email worm is also known as Waledac, and is able to steal data and send spam," Kaspersky Lab reports
Originally posted by allclear
"and the guy there was really helpful. He sold me Norton 2009 and said that would take care of the problem."
LMFAO!!! Now that's funny. Good luck with that one. Norton is the FIRST thing I remove from a new computer.
Buy something top of the line like Kaspersky. You'll never have any problems. I don't even bother with the MS updates, since half those are used to further screw up your computer. Keep it simple. Stick with XP, forget the updates, don't use Outlook or other MS programs, and get a good comprehensive protection software like Kaspersky.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
I was speculating
So even with your firewalls you were unable to stop them/us/whoever. Having only 1 or perhaps 2 attacks in the past 2 or 10 years does not exlude you from an ongoing possible intrusion.
>* It does not matter if you have a legal copy of MS, if they are connected to a mainframe then that can be injected. The code works on a multiple parameters. Since you did state that they are updated, then i doubt that your USER would go into the MS site to see if there are any new recent updates.
>*Indeed people traveling for lengthy times overseas are the most vulnerable, but you should factor in that about 90% of all these people to tend to log into some form of network, either its a social or commercial or private interface to interact with their family's. This is what is most commonly monitored and obviously most vulnerable.
Originally posted by tristar
By excluding hypothetical scenarios is like asking a 2 year old to test pilot an experimental aircraft.
Originally posted by makeitso
Originally posted by tristar
By excluding hypothetical scenarios is like asking a 2 year old to test pilot an experimental aircraft.
Are you admitting that your statement about conficker stealing data, etc. was hypothetical, not based on research of confickers programing?
[edit on 4/26/09 by makeitso]