It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
A better vision would be to have a clearly hierarchical society, with mobility in between the levels based on merit.
Originally posted by pieman
so yeah, by all means have a society that is unfair, but have one that is unfair relative to the ability of it's members rather than unfair relative to the size of daddies check book.
Originally posted by infinite
Significant amount of our richest members in the United Kingdom are not there due to their parents wealth - that is a classiest stereotype.
In your society, hard working citizens are punished for achieving wealth while others become dependent on the state.
Originally posted by pieman
have you got figures for that? am i to just take your word on it?
Originally posted by pieman
to be fair, the people above £150k a year are the ones benefiting from all these banking bail-outs, don't see why they shouldn't have to pay the biggest proportion of their wages until it's all paid back, the bailouts are all going to have to be funded from taxes after all is said and done, why the heck shouldn't those who benefit most contribute most.
[edit on 22/4/09 by pieman]
Originally posted by Dermo
Originally posted by pieman
have you got figures for that? am i to just take your word on it?
So what you are saying is.. everyone in the UK that is wealthy has received it from their parents?
Originally posted by blueorder
we all benefited from the banking system not collapsing
Originally posted by pieman
have you got figures for that? am i to just take your word on it?
what society is that, do you want to respond to what i said or just mouth off on a pre-programmed rant. responding to a point i never made is a fairly lazy way of responding, why even bother?
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Where does your "exploiting the masses" argument work with scientific researchers who invent new drugs or medical devices? Where does it work with those who paint pictures, or those who write books? According to you, are all these people workshy?
there is certainly a value attached to the ability to organise and co-ordinate labour, but this value is certainly not 2 or 3 hundred times the value of the labour itself.
so yeah, by all means have a society that is unfair, but have one that is unfair relative to the ability of it's members rather than unfair relative to the size of daddies check book.
Originally posted by infinite
Well seeing you criticised my viewpoint, therefore you didn't support it and are in the favour of the complete opposite.
Originally posted by pieman
unfair relative to the size of daddies check book.
Originally posted by pieman
people should be valued for their worth, not their social class.
so yeah, by all means have a society that is unfair, but have one that is unfair relative to the ability of it's members rather than unfair relative to the size of daddies check book.
people should be valued for their worth, not their social class.
Originally posted by infinite
You are automatically assuming it has everything to do with the rich, a classic socialist argument. Have you thought the problem could be associated to the labour force, too political, weak and unproductive?
Are you seeing why Thatcher restricted the voice of the Trade Unions? Give the workers a voice allowed them to asking questions and gave them the belief they are in control.
But their not and never will be.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Pieman, I think it's time for you to shut your piehole.