It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Republican08
Jury is still out for me on it. ( Keep in mind I am atheist )
I hear about these jewish groups who control all the wars and the world persay. And it goes back to around or before jesus' time.
And it raises a question for me, if someone was bent on controlling the world why would they plan for it so far into the future, 2,000+.
, I would want to rule it, I wouldn't be worried about 2,000 years from now. (But albeit that may just be my way of thinking)
I mean, why the wait, they could do it now couldn't they.
If you could answer this for me, you would greatly enlighten me, and i've seen you around here and you seem a very savvy person to explain this to me.
[edit on 18-4-2009 by Republican08]
What does Satanic ritual have to do with anything? Elite meet. They decide the way they want the world to run, pull the strings necessary to set those plans in action. They can (and likely do) do all that without having to resort to arcane ritual or pedophilia or half the other things they get accused of doing. So why do you insist they have to be doing Satanic rituals?
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
I think it is easy for me to see that secret societies have been meeting. All that political elites have done was say that what they were doing is in the name of Democracy. But, I do not think that any of what happened in the past has changed. I believe that political elites are meeting still in secret and they are still doing satanic rituals in various places. I do not think that they are representative of us. Skeptics, while you may not believe in the bilderburg conspiracy to its intent, or, while you may doubt certain claims made about the group I have to ask you-- what makes you think that the elites aren't still meeting today? I think it's possible that they are meeting in secret still and that this Democratic revolution could be fake, while, in reality they are still meeting in secret to this very day. All the people who don't know are kept out of the loop, but, do you see what I'm saying?
posted on 18-4-2009 at 09:45 PM
What does Satanic ritual have to do with anything? Elite meet. They decide the way they want the world to run, pull the strings necessary to set those plans in action. They can (and likely do) do all that without having to resort to arcane ritual or pedophilia or half the other things they get accused of doing. So why do you insist they have to be doing Satanic rituals?
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
Doesn't that sound satanic to you?
They take pleasure in our pain. They're psychopaths.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
If they're not, you know, ACTUALLY worshipping Satan? Then no. It doesn't sound satanic. It sounds psychopathic or sociopathic. You said yourself, it has nothing to do with religion. You're weakening your own stance by including any mentions of Satan in your argument, particularly when you say it's not about religion.
They take pleasure in our pain. They're psychopaths.
Agnosticism (Greek: α- a-, without + γνώσις gnōsis, knowledge; after Gnosticism) is the philosophical view that the truth value of certain claims — particularly metaphysical claims regarding theology, afterlife or the existence of deities, ghosts, or even ultimate reality — is unknown or, depending on the form of agnosticism, inherently impossible to prove or disprove. It is often put forth as a middle ground between theism and atheism,[1] though it is not a religious declaration in itself.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by Frankidealist35
Satanic? You stated in this thread that you're "agnostic". Which means:
Agnosticism (Greek: α- a-, without + γνώσις gnōsis, knowledge; after Gnosticism) is the philosophical view that the truth value of certain claims — particularly metaphysical claims regarding theology, afterlife or the existence of deities, ghosts, or even ultimate reality — is unknown or, depending on the form of agnosticism, inherently impossible to prove or disprove. It is often put forth as a middle ground between theism and atheism,[1] though it is not a religious declaration in itself.
en.wikipedia.org...
If you're agnostic how do you resolve the discrepancy between your "belief" and the fact that Satan is "otherworldly", thus not something that you don't believe in?
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
Agnosticism isn't atheism. I am a spiritualist, so, I believe the powers at be are manipulating spiritual forces. After all, why would NASA worship Egyptian Gods?
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
I do know what agnosticism is. Like you said, agnosticism is a term used to describe people who want to discern truth about religion. I can explain my agnostic beliefs if you want me to. Let me explain to you what agnosticism is. It's about constantly questioning if there is a God or if there isn't a God.
I believe that these "Gods" are really alien beings who people mistook for a higher power.
Of course I care about how religion is used or what it does to people.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
I do know what agnosticism is. Like you said, agnosticism is a term used to describe people who want to discern truth about religion. I can explain my agnostic beliefs if you want me to. Let me explain to you what agnosticism is. It's about constantly questioning if there is a God or if there isn't a God.
Wrong. See my post above. As an Agnostic myself I know what it means.
1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable ; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god2: a person unwilling to commit to an opinion about something
I believe that these "Gods" are really alien beings who people mistook for a higher power.
Of course I care about how religion is used or what it does to people.
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable ; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god2: a person unwilling to commit to an opinion about something