In addition to biological attacks such as bird flu - what do ATSers think of the following scenario?
A new world order would be virtually impossible in the kind of world that we live in at present. There are over six billion people with such diverse
beliefs and customs, too many dissenters and and too many power seekers.
Taking into consideration global wind patterns, the NWO have probably calculated how much nuclear material and toxic gases would need to be released
to kill off most humans on the planet. They already have the data from the aftermath of Chernobyl to work with.
Belarus suffered from approximately 70 per cent of the fallout from the Chernobyl catastrophe. There are high rates of morbidity in Belarus than
anywhere else affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe. And the elevated cancer rates in Belarus are 16 times higher than in those countries not affected
(1) Has research been undertaken on animals and/or humans every few years since the Chernobyl disaster (1986) to try and determine when it would be
safe to introduce humans and/or animals into a location that has experienced heavy fallout without those animals and/or humans experiencing harmful
ailments/defects/side effects or fatalities ?
(2) I live in the UK and have never been to Belarus. If I were able to live and work in Belarus this year (2009), am I very likely to be harmfully or
fatally affected by the remnants of nuclear fallout from the Chernobyl disaster of 1986 (22 years ago)? Or has the residue from nuclear fallout now
dropped to a level that is considered safe to human health?
Data collected about nuclear fallout, from locations such as Belarus, would give government an indication as to whether a deliberately planned global
nuclear catastrophe was a realistic option for reducing the world human population and how long survivors would be required to live in underground
camps/cities before reinhabiting above ground areas.
For those chosen to survive underground; carbohydrates, protein, fats and vitamins could be stored in packets/containers. Above ground, radiation
would contaminate almost everything that humans would have hoped to survive on - plants, animals, tinned food, packaged food etc. Radiation would be
in the air, getting into every nook and cranny and it would probably also destroy harmful viruses such as HIV/AIDS and bacteria such as MRSA. What a
way to deal with many of the world's problems at once!
People living underground could probably be fed for decades using methods such as this www.factoryfarming.org.uk...
Slaughtered battery hens can be processed into soups, baby foods, stock cubes etc. Battery hens are bred to be lean, to eat little and lay a lot.
Wind farms and other forms of renewable energy, could possibly provide the electricity for those safely tucked away in underground camps/cities. Water
from the sea could be desalinated.
If most life were wiped out by a nuclear catastrophe, genetisists among the survivors, in underground camps/cities, could breed organisms such as blow
flies that would be released at numerous locations and multiply as they fed on carcasses. Genetic engineering could possibly also be used to increase
the species/number of plants, mammals, insects etc so as to replenish the earth once it was safe to do so.
When the human survivors came above ground to live, the released blow flies and other organisns, would have left them with more manageable skeletons
to clear up.
Those chosen to survive would possibly be given identity cards, details of their DNA would be on a database to make crime detection easier, one set of
laws would cover all continents and everyone would be taught to speak the same language.