Remember The Tank Man!!! Why Communism Is Not The Answer Now or Ever! , page 1/
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 12-4-2009 @ 11:32 AM by mystiq
The truth is both communism and capitalism are flawed, instrinsically. The Scandinavian countries which are capitalistic too in todays world, and monied, have something that the US and China do not have (for both the US, UK and China share a common theme, believe it or not, and the Scandinavian countries share a common theme. The distribution of power. It doesn't have to do with how you blend the ability to create economy and industry versus social obligations, tax dollars boomeranging back to their citizens in superlative programs, or equalizing wealth between individuals. Thats core to a civilized world and most of the world isn't as civil! What it really has to do with is fascism (Communist China), fascism (pseudo democracy UK and US, which really operates like an illegal pyramid scheme monopoly, mascarading as a free-enterprise and capitalism, versus real democracy, grass roots, non-bloodline democracy, and sharing of power with the people. This is called proportional democracy.

Proportional democracy is the highest model of democracy or any form of government on the planet. Unlike the winner take all model, the percentages you vote for fill the house. Ie. a man like our BC premier cannot win a majority government on 40% roughly vote in his riding and province wide, with 60% split between the green and ndp. Because in proportional democracy 60% green and ndp would fill the house. All governments become minority and need to learn to cooperate. People and their public input actually carries weight. Many more parties, ie. non-bloodline elite ones, get formed and actually win seats. Many more women run. Consequently you see wonderful programs and shared wealth, along with very good world businesses. Its a win win situation.

This, done in a moneyless resource society, sort of like the venus project, without any patents or ownership of any inventions or ideas, and people driven, would be a very good world to live in. Everything else is massive child abuse.

[edit on 12-4-2009 by mystiq]



reply posted on 12-4-2009 @ 11:43 AM by burntheships
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe



China has nothing to do with communism? I am hoping you would expound on that thought.

The Communist Party of China (CPC), also known as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is the founding and the ruling political party of the People's Republic of China and the world's largest political party

en.wikipedia.org...

Pro Communism thread here

[edit on 12-4-2009 by burntheships]

[edit on 12-4-2009 by burntheships]


reply posted on 12-4-2009 @ 11:58 AM by burntheships
reply to post by mystiq



In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights. The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.

A republic and a democracy are nearly identical...In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual person. In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group.

Our Republic (United States) is one dedicated to "liberty and justice for all." Minority individual rights are the priority. The people have natural rights instead of civil rights. The people are protected by the Bill of Rights from the majority. One vote in a jury can stop all of the majority from depriving any one of the people of his rights; this would not be so if the United States were a democracy.

www.1215.org...


[edit on 12-4-2009 by burntheships]



reply posted on 12-4-2009 @ 01:57 PM by burntheships
reply to post by RKWWWW



That would be a diabolical system, run by a computer. Remember Hal?
Killer Hal Computer in Space Oddessy Hal became an evil villian!
It was ranked #13 on a list of greatest film villains of all time on the AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains.



reply posted on 13-4-2009 @ 02:12 PM by burntheships
reply to post by andy1033



Perhaps the scenario you refer to is something out of a science fiction movie, such as Terminator. That kind of a theory makes for good movies, like Space Oddessy, where eventually Hal sought to destroy the people on his ship because he percieved they were a threat to him; Not unlike the elitest PTB that potentially seek to destroy 90% of the worlds poulation as they are a threat to the "fertile abundant earth" that they wish to have all to themselves. And not unlike communist China, that limits female population through forced abortions, and sterilzations, to create a society that the governments percieves "desireable"


reply posted on 14-4-2009 @ 07:09 PM by smallpeeps
Hell yeah! Tank man is awesome! Love that guy!

Well, democracy won't restrict the minority if that is watched for. That is to say, democracy being flawed, is not really true because it obviously is the only way. The flaw comes in the gaps through which the jerkwads will try to wreck the vote or oppress the minority.

I do agree with the statement that "tech" will become the central holy grail for this problem, but again as mentioned, who wants a Deibold machine? No, the machine would have to be verifiable at a granular level. Proprietary tech will never succeed as dreamed up here. I am saying that tech as such (wonderful little gadgets) will ultimately be the lifeline which humans reach for. It could be bad or good, depending on the transparency.

I do like the idea of a commune tho. I get to pursue the appreciation of nature at an intense level while planting beans and so on. But communes don't work on a large scale and the Soviet farming experiments proved that a disaster, yet the nation saved themselves collectively through their little garden plots. So a small apartment for example would have a commune-type garden which fed the whole building because the government was being imploded and looted. I am saying that small scale farming is the biggest solution which Americans need to detach from their mental picture of what is evil about communism.

What is evil about communism: Large scale farming failures and large, growing prison populations/gulags. These can also crop up in any other government also. The specifics have not been discussed enough, so thanks for this thread.

[edit on 14-4-2009 by smallpeeps]


reply posted on 14-4-2009 @ 09:32 PM by burntheships
reply to post by smallpeeps



Thank you, and thanks for your contribution to this thread. Your comments are so true. Knowledge is power...especially when it comes to food, farming and production. Definitely agreed that a 22 will never feed anyone, only to protect food, or take food.

The U.S. government has been effective in distancing it's populace from the knowledge of sustainable gardening and farming...thankfully we still have the internet from now. Corporations like Monsanto do the evil bidding with small farms as targets and non gmo seeds control.

With corporations llike Mosanto that have all the governments backing with legislation like CODEX...our "Republic" is a danger to it's own citizens.


reply posted on 15-4-2009 @ 03:21 PM by Aeons
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to
post by mystiq



In a pure democracy, 51% beats 49%. In other words, the minority has no rights. The minority only has those privileges granted by the dictatorship of the majority.

[edit on 12-4-2009 by burntheships]


That is not democracy that you are describing. That is fascism. Democracy always has a place for the minority to be represented.
You guys need to go back to school.


reply posted on 15-4-2009 @ 08:14 PM by burntheships
reply to post by CapsFan8



Perhaps someone is having delusions...but it is not I.

In political science, a Communist state is a state with a form of government characterized by single-party rule of a Communist party and a professed allegiance to a communist ideology as the guiding principle of the state.

Communist states may have several legal political parties, but the Communist party is usually granted a special or dominant role in government, often by statute or under the constitution. Consequently, the institutions of the state and of the Communist party become intimately entwined, such as in the development of parallel institutions.

While almost all claim lineage to Marxist thought, there are many varieties of Communist states, with indigenous adaptions. For Marxist-Leninists, the state and the Communist Party claim to act in accordance with the wishes of the industrial working class; for Maoists, the state and party claim to act in accordance to the peasantry. Under Deng Xiaoping, the People's Republic of China proclaimed a policy of "socialism with Chinese characteristics." In most Communist states, governments assert that they represent the democratic dictatorship of the proletariat.

Most Communist states adopted planned economies. However, there are exceptions: The Soviet Union during the 1920s and Yugoslavia after World War II allowed limited markets and a degree of worker self-management, while China and Vietnam have introduced far-reaching market reforms since the 1980s.
en.wikipedia.org...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 10 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 11 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 3 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Posted 0 days ago with 9 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 11 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags