It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by Annee
I think the best way of resolving this is to prove the vote unconstitutional. By out of state unfair and false campaign practices or something.
If judges go against a majority rule without just cause - - that could really get ugly.
How can a constitutional amendment be unconstitutional when the majority voted on it? I would think the amendment BEFORE it is voted on is where all this should happen. For the courts to let it go to a vote is basically saying it is good to go.
Also, gay marriage is not a fundamental right under the US constitution so a state can vote on it for the state constitution.
Originally posted by Annee
I think you read only what you want to read.
Try again.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by Annee
I think you read only what you want to read.
Try again.
Ok read it again....
And I would say again that a constitutional amendment cannot be unconstitutional when the majority votes, so I missing the point to your outside state thing.
And I would say again that a constitutional amendment cannot be unconstitutional when the majority votes, so I missing the point to your outside state thing.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Whether it is gay marriage, death penalty or whatever if the majority votes one way or the other I say let it stand. This is why we are the “United States” and not just one big state. If you do not like the policies/laws of a state DON’T LIVE THERE.
Gay marriage is not the issue here, but the court ruling over what the majority voted on is.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
The real issue is whether or not the people have a say in their constitution.
Originally posted by atoms.2008
If the PEOPLE Vote a Constitutional Amendment IN, it CANNOT be Unconstitutional, It Is A PART OF The Constitution !
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by Annee
I think you read only what you want to read.
Try again.
Ok read it again....
And I would say again that a constitutional amendment cannot be unconstitutional when the majority votes, so I missing the point to your outside state thing.
My post was about whether out of state interference and funding had any bearing on the legitimacy of the vote.
Whether there was any cause to recall a vote because it was obtained by falsehoods.
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by slicobacon
Who is the majority to dictate how a minority can live.....especially when that decision is based on fear and religious fervor?
There should not be a place for those types of votes in this society.
Gays are no more or less than us straight people.....and they shouldn't be treated as anything other than equal.
Originally posted by skeptic1
That being said, I would hope if homosexual marriage is ever allowed nationwide that they wouldn't be protesting on the steps of churches.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Originally posted by Xtrozero
...
Gay marriage is not the issue here, but the court ruling over what the majority voted on is.
I have to agree with you on this. ... Its either what the people have voted or its going to be what the government says is so.
A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
- Thomas Jefferson
Originally posted by SuperSecretSquirrel
What I do care about is churches being forced to recognizes these marriages when they are so adamantly opposed to it.
Let them do what they want, just don't force it upon religion.
I voted for prop 8 because my impression was that it would what I stated above.
(Emphasis mine)
SEC. 1. The Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, may propose an amendment or revision of the Constitution and in the same manner may amend or withdraw its proposal. Each amendment shall be so prepared and submitted that it can be voted on separately.
SEC. 2. The Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, may submit at a general election the question whether to call a convention to revise the Constitution. If the majority vote yes on that question, within 6 months the Legislature shall provide for the convention. Delegates to a constitutional convention shall be voters elected from districts as nearly equal in population as may be practicable.
SEC. 3. The electors may amend the Constitution by initiative.
SEC. 4. A proposed amendment or revision shall be submitted to the electors and if approved by a majority of votes thereon takes effect the day after the election unless the measure provides otherwise. If provisions of 2 or more measures approved at the same election conflict, those of the measure receiving the highest affirmative vote shall prevail.
Originally posted by jd140
The people of California voted and just because it didn't turn out the way they wanted they want to over turn it.
Why even vote for to begin with.
This is stupid to even consider over turning something that was voted on.
Originally posted by emeraldzeus
reply to post by skeptic1
As a Christian...
I think it's fair to say that NO ONE on this earth is is a position to judge. If being gay is wrong, then God will judge them, plain and simple.
It doesn't mean I love my gay friends any less, or wish ill feelings on them, or don't think they deserve the same rights. It is their RIGHT to chose how they want to live their lives, and I don't judge. However, I want what I have to be DISTINCTLY different in description in the eyes of the law...
Why, then, is this notion so difficult to grasp, and why are the Christians being made out to be prejudice jerks? Most are not, and are silent in their views.
By the way, I've read several instances of where Christians will push to have the law changed to describe a marriage between a man and woman to a "covenant marriage"
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
It's too bad we all have to wait 90 days for the outcome. I certainly hope this is overturned. Prop 8 is like revoking the rights of black people to marry (which they once weren't allowed to do).
I don't care how the majority feels about it, equal rights means equal rights for ALL.