It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by sos37
Read this post. The California Constitution can be revised, but it requires a 2/3 vote of the legislature, which didn't happen.
Originally posted by sos37
Then what was the purpose of putting Prop 8 on the ballot in the first place if the outcome wasn't going to be honored? Just more wasteful spending at the expense of the taxpayers - which, by the way, includes gays and straights.
Yes, but I don't think a state can make a law that goes against the US Constitution.
Originally posted by sos37
Then what was the purpose of putting Prop 8 on the ballot in the first place if the outcome wasn't going to be honored?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by sos37
Well, that's really beside the point for the purpose of this discussion, isn't it? I mean, yes, it was a mistake for it to be there, and there was money wasted (much of it coming from other states) but that doesn't mean it should stand.
California's economic issues really aren't related to this subject.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Basically, the Catholic and Mormon Churches with support from other religious organizations.
Originally posted by sos37
There's another tangent that this decision will no doubt open to California voters who may not fully understand how Prop 8 was (will be) nullified - if the state can null and void any vote that they don't agree with then why should I bother casting a vote in the future for anything?
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Whether it is gay marriage, death penalty or whatever if the majority votes one way or the other I say let it stand. This is why we are the “United States” and not just one big state. If you do not like the policies/laws of a state DON’T LIVE THERE.
When we take “we the people” and put that into the hands of a liberal or conservative court of just a few, who know what is good for us ignorant, we are risking more of our freedom and the rights of the people.
Gay marriage is not the issue here, but the court ruling over what the majority voted on is.
Originally posted by Annee
I think the best way of resolving this is to prove the vote unconstitutional. By out of state unfair and false campaign practices or something.
If judges go against a majority rule without just cause - - that could really get ugly.