Poor kids in N.M. schools forced to eat cold cheese sandwiches when parents can't pay, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times
Topic started on 25-2-2009 @ 01:46 PM by BlackOps719
Link to story





ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – A cold cheese sandwich, fruit and a milk carton might not seem like much of a meal — but that's what's on the menu for students in New Mexico's largest school district without their lunch money.

Faced with mounting unpaid lunch charges in the economic downturn, Albuquerque Public Schools last month instituted a "cheese sandwich policy," serving the alternative meals to children whose parents are supposed to be able to pay for some or all of their regular meals but fail to pick up the tab.

Such policies have become a necessity for schools seeking to keep budgets in the black while ensuring children don't go hungry. School districts including those in Chula Vista, Calif.; Hillsborough County, Fla.; and Lynnwood, Wash.; have also taken to serving cheese sandwiches to children with delinquent lunch accounts.

Critics argue the cold meals are a form of punishment for children whose parents can't afford to pay. Parents who qualify for free meals are not affected.

"We've heard stories from moms coming in saying their child was pulled out of the lunch line and given a cheese sandwich," said Nancy Pope, director of the New Mexico Collaborative to End Hunger. "One woman said her daughter never wants to go back to school."

Some Albuquerque parents have tearfully pleaded with school board members to stop singling out their children because they're poor, while others have flooded talk radio shows thanking the district for imposing a policy that commands parental responsibility.

Second-grader Danessa Vigil said she will never eat sliced cheese again. She had to eat cheese sandwiches because her mother couldn't afford to give her lunch money while her application for free lunch was being processed.

"Every time I eat it, it makes me feel like I want to throw up," the 7-year-old said.





I do realize that school systems and states in general are suffering from budget shortfalls and in serious need of cost cutting measures. However, in this instance Im not sure this is the right approach to saving a few bucks.

Doesn't it seem wrong to single out and humiliate elementary age school children because of the inability of the parents to pay? Yes I know what many heartless types will say, they are deadbeats and as such deserve no sympathy.

But isn't that the whole point here? Does it not fall on the parent to shoulder the blame for not having the ability to pay? Isnt it a bit cruel and unusual to humiliate young children for the short comings of the parent?

Can you imagine the ridicule that a youngster would face, being singled out and pulled aside in front of an entire cafeteria full of their peers and forced to eat a welfare cheese sandwich in shame.


I can see the point of view of the school officials on one hand because yes, parents should pay their fair share of the cost. But on the other hand I feel bad for thse children and see them as an innocent victim here. No doubt the stigma attached for a young child to be mocked in such a way will carry over to their adult lives.

Couldn't they find a better way to handle the problem than resorting to public humiliation of the children?

[edit on 2/25/09 by BlackOps719]


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 02:28 PM by burdman30ott6
No, it doesn't seem wrong. I grew up in Southern NM. In elementary school, I remember the teachers right before lunch pulling out a list and a handfull of tickets and calling up kids by name to take their lunch ticket. These were welfare kids getting their tax payer paid for lunch stub. I remember more than once forgetting to grab my $1 on my way out the door and ending up going without a lunch. Now, I provide those two stories to say this... they eliminated the "in front of everyone" ticket handout because it supposedly "humiliated" the poor kids. Strange thing, I don't ever remember anyone making fun of or even saying anything negative to those kids, nor do I recall them acting like it was some sort of embarassment. Also, I don't recall any negative side effects from going without lunch. I'm 6'4" and weigh 320 lbs... if going without lunch stunted my growth, then I want reparations from the school for crushing my hopes of being a pro wrestler, NBA center, or body double for Godzilla.

Nothing wrong with a cheese sandwich at all. I love them, and still have them for lunch myself at times. If having deadbeat parents is shamefull to these kids, then I say that's a great thing! Maybe it means they'll try to break the cycle and not be deadbeats themselves. If they saw it with no shame, then it would probably mean the fruit isn't falling far from the tree. Furthermore, why in the hell should tax dollars be used to feed these kids, anyway? WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT POVERTY STRICKEN CHILDREN HERE. The kids who's parents are truly poor get subsidised lunches. We're talking about kids whose parents are making a concious decision not to pay their fair share for their child's dietary needs.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 02:32 PM by burdman30ott6
reply to post by marg6043



Heh heh... my NM school's lunches were God awful. Not to be gross, but I always marveled at how they smelled the same on their way out the next day as the caffeteria had smells the previous day at lunch. Strangely, the one item I loved then and still crave when I think about it was the breaded chicken patties. "Chicken pucks" we called them... for something that looked so unappetizing and had the consistancy of rawhide, something in them sure tasted good.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 02:32 PM by marg6043
reply to post by staple



You are right the do serve peanut butter sandwiches also, how can I forget about that one.

I think all schools do that to save money.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 02:36 PM by marg6043
reply to post by burdman30ott6



I tell you I will not touch the school lunches they serve now a days for anything in the world, I rather starve.

like I said when I was growing up the smells coming out of the school cafeteria when I was in school will make you mouth water.

The school cafeteria in my Island actually cook everything from scratch or almost from scratch.

Beans, rice, meat and desert all to match the Island typical diet, I still remember those meals and they were free for everybody.


reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 02:41 PM by BlackOps719
reply to post by burdman30ott6





I guess this is just another example of hard times hitting close to home. And again I understand the reasoning behind it, it just seems like they are using it as a pinishment for kids who are poor through no fault of their own.


And yes the welfare peanut butter does suck. Not even good on toast.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Mainstream Media IGNORES Iceland Revolution
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
Paul says “Next Crisis will be More Destructive”
  Posted 19 days ago with 29 member flags
Nigel Farage: The EU Titanic Has Now Hit The Iceberg
  Posted 17 days ago with 26 member flags
Here Are The 5 Worst Places To Be When The Dollar Collapses
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
The Coming Canadian Housing Crash
  Posted 13 days ago with 18 member flags
What is *THE* domino you\'re waiting for, and why?
  Posted 7 days ago with 17 member flags
Greece bank run
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
Facebook insider sales are huge red flags
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags