It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
China has welcomed a recent decision by Kyrgyz government to shut a US airbase in the country, saying that Beijing respects the decision.
"Kyrgyzstan is a sovereign state. We respect its decision and are willing to see peace, stability and development in Central Asia." Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said Thursday.
Kyrgyzstan has confirmed that it will close a US air base on its soil, cutting a main supply route to US-led forces in Afghanistan.
www.presstv.ir...§ionid=351020406
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (CNN) -- Pakistan has indefinitely blocked travel for convoys, carrying food and military supplies to U.S. troops in Afghanistan, through a key mountain pass
edition.cnn.com...
Supplying troops in landlocked Afghanistan has long been the Achilles' heel of foreign armies here, most recently the Soviets, whose forces were nearly crippled by Islamist insurgent attacks on vulnerable supply lines.
About 75 percent of NATO and U.S. supplies bound for Afghanistan -- including gas, food and military equipment -- are transported over land through Pakistan. The journey begins in the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi and continues north through Pakistan's volatile North-West Frontier Province and tribal areas before supplies arrive at the Afghan border. The convoys then press forward along mountain hairpin turns through areas of Afghanistan that are known as havens for insurgents.
www.washingtonpost.com...
Moscow says it has agreed to a US request to ship non-military supplies for its troops in Afghanistan across Russian territory.
Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said Russia was waiting for the US to provide details of the shipments before giving specific permission.
news.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by RFBurns
I think its just you gettting too much into conspiracy theories.
The US can airlift supplies directly to where its needed. Any supplies they need can get where its needed.
There are always alternatives.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by DrumsRfun
I was talking with a friend of mine about them cutting off supply routes.
We talked about the idea that maybe other nations aren't going to give much of a crap about helping them because they are losing their status as a superpower.
America was able to get people who hate them to help them out of fear of pissing off the Americans.
For me I see America losing their superpower status and that is the conclusion I have made.
Originally posted by RFBurns
Never underestimate the ability of the US Air Force. Especially now that we have all these UAV's with formidable weapons capability that can be sent ahead of any air supply convoy and take out any ground SAM threat, not to mention the manned fighters that have weapons that can take out targets in the air from miles out.
Im not saying it would be a walk in the park. But what I am saying is that the problem of logistics would be well thought out and planned ahead of time, and any contingency they can dream of that might happen, they will have a means to deal with it before even the first supply convoy is sent up.
Originally posted by Zenagain
See: Berlin Airlift. End of discussion.
Originally posted by munkey66
Is that why you are still in Iraq and Afghanistan?
because everything was thought out before hand?
Originally posted by munkey66
reply to post by RFBurns
I do agree with you on the reasons ect.
And yes the US has developed some very nasty weapons to use.
Currently the US economy is not what you would call healthy.
Obama wants to send more troops to Afghanistan thinking that a surge is going to win the war.
I am personally of the belief that the idea behind this is to create a state of emergency and have the US military taken down.
As stupid as that sounds, it will open up an oportunity to make the UN a much bigger, badder military unit.
As long as there is a large powerful US military, the chance of the UN taking over as world police is limited.
The President-Elect's intention to shift the focus of the fight against terrorism to Afghanistan has been bolstered by Robert Gates agreement to stay on as Defence Secretary.
Mr Gates is a strong believer in an Afghan surge, which would not only put thousands more boots on the ground but involve negotiations with malleable branches of the Taliban.
It would also aim to boost co-operation with Iran and Pakistan where some elements have supported the anti-Western insurgency.
The need for more US troops in addition to the 32,000 already serving, has been accelerated by the Afghan presidential election in September 2009, and the voter registration process that begins in the New Year, Mr Gates said.
www.telegraph.co.uk...[/quote ]
It does look like Obama wants to push in again.
[edit on 7-2-2009 by munkey66]
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by DrumsRfun
I was talking with a friend of mine about them cutting off supply routes.
We talked about the idea that maybe other nations aren't going to give much of a crap about helping them because they are losing their status as a superpower.
America was able to get people who hate them to help them out of fear of pissing off the Americans.
For me I see America losing their superpower status and that is the conclusion I have made.
Well it doesnt matter what the viewpoint of the world is about America's status. The world could say all it wants to that America is no longer viewed as a superpower, but thats all it is..hear say.
When it gets down to business...we have the hardware, we have the men and women, and we have the capabilities. Superpower is just a label, nothing more. A label can change on a box but unless you change the contents of that box, the box of contents is still the same.
Cheers!!!!
[edit on 7-2-2009 by RFBurns]