It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by emsed1
Masonry does not have any beliefs or requirements on race, but rather teaches that everyone is equal. You aren't 'required' to believe in equality but if it bothers you then you might not like Freemasonry.
You must also believe in a Supreme Being and have no felonies (local lodge requirement, mileage may vary).
I don't think it would be an issue of Freemasonry 'accepting' you, but rather your comfort with the teachings that we are all equal under the Supreme.
Discussion of racial issues (in my lodge anyway) would fall under the same prohibition as religion/politics. In other words racial beliefs would never be discussed in the lodge due to the possibility of disharmony.
Originally posted by AqualungOnTheParkBench
Originally posted by emsed1
Masonry does not have any beliefs or requirements on race, but rather teaches that everyone is equal. You aren't 'required' to believe in equality but if it bothers you then you might not like Freemasonry.
Ah. I do firmly believe in equality in the eyes of God, yeah. I support racial diversity, but believe all races are created equally by God.
Originally posted by AqualungOnTheParkBench
The only thing still questionable is the Scottish Rite, as much of it's literature seems to indicate all religious paths are equal in reaching God. That's something I don't agree with.
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
I don't know that your qualification quite passes the sniff test. Please correct me if I'm wrong but you seem to believe in separate-but-equal, kind of like the seats at the back of the bus are as plush as those at the front; it's just that they're reserved for certain riders?
Equal is equal without prevarication.
Originally posted by Saurus
I, for one, would blackball a candidate who would not treat a Mason of a different race as his brother.
Originally posted by AqualungOnTheParkBench
Originally posted by Fitzgibbon
I don't know that your qualification quite passes the sniff test. Please correct me if I'm wrong but you seem to believe in separate-but-equal, kind of like the seats at the back of the bus are as plush as those at the front; it's just that they're reserved for certain riders?
Equal is equal without prevarication.
There seems to be a massive misunderstanding here. I believe all people are equal. I do also believe human races were guided to their specific phenotypes by God, and thus oppose racemixing in breeding.
Despite my views on who should screw who, I believe all humans should be treated equally, with their individual merit being the only deciding factor.
My "separate but equal" views apply only to breeding, essentially.
Originally posted by Saurus
I, for one, would blackball a candidate who would not treat a Mason of a different race as his brother.
I would treat a Mason of a different race as my brother, but I wouldn't have children with his sister.