posted on Jan, 26 2009 @ 12:28 PM
I've thought of the time-travel-concept too as a possible reasoning for UFOs/IFOs in our space-time but there are a number of variables which must
be, to make it happen.
Think of things from their point-of-view. If you went back in time to change something, on purpose or by accident, you would change the course of your
own existence. Expensive way to commit suicide, unless you are merely creating an alternate string of time then you aren't changing your own future
but creating another dimension's future. There really is only one possible way the time travel idea could work in the quantum scheme of things. They
would have traveled back to a point where all evidence of their existence would be nulled if found today. If they traveled back to the time of the
dinosaur and created a colony but then traveled to the future to make any changes to the time-line, thus insuring their own safety then they could
cause the end of man and we would never know it. That wouldn't be their goal though. It would be too easy. Their goal would be to correct the many
mistakes as they happen and trouble shoot new mistakes as they appear. Their goal would be the same as any other life form on the planet, to
This and other theories are merely speculation as we haven't any proof. What we do have are the many thousands of sightings going back for tens of
thousands of years. From cave drawings of the Cro-Magnon to carvings of the Aztecs and the countless photos of the modern era, eyewitness accounts of
these visitors have proven one thing for certain; we are not alone.
My point of the original thread-post was to change the way we all think and to, perhaps, change how we ask our questions when we have government
officials on the spot.
With this change in mind how might we ask an official if UFO/IFOs are here?
Which questions would we ask?
Remember... in a press setting you may only get one question to ask, so make it a doozy.
Be specific so we can help each other tweak our questions. Let's leave no avenue of escaping the truth when they seek to answer our questions. If
they will tell the truth then let us hear it or hear, no comment. No comment is also an omission of the truth and confirmation to the world
that there is a cover-up.