It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sorry, I know it's off topic, but was wondering if there a good online comparison of different aircraft that anyone knows of?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Additionally as you alluded, cold air is mixed in with the hot gases, along with nozzle design and materials, to lower the IR footprint.
www.f-22raptor.com...
www.f-22raptor.com...
Originally posted by C0bzz
Every aircraft with a radar is its own mini-AWACs.
Every aircraft does not have a AN/APG-77, IFDL, and ALR-94?
Originally posted by C0bzz
Update the firmware if that threat finally comes to existance then? Degrade performance, how? Declutter? What kind of datalink are we talking about?
Jam the radio frequency?
Originally posted by C0bzz
Could you point me to some articles that show the system of LPI the F-22 uses could be detected? That would be wide spectrum, random pulses, with ultra-low sidelobes. Frequency modulation is used on 30 year old MSA radars, so that doesn't count.
Thanks.
Originally posted by C0bzz
That doesn't work.
www.aoe.vt.edu...
At the WVR combat is going to take place TVC will not be a massive advantage, and certainly, 3d TVC is hardly an advantage over 2d... How is the Flanker a better airframe?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Radio jamming? Not to mention that a radio signal is a LOT easier to pick up than their LPI radar will be. Radio can get confusing too. Pilots have a tendency to tune out some broadcasts, and have to repeat them. So it's not just a quick broadcast, and your flight lead knows just what's going on.
Originally posted by Zaphod58 If you're using your radio THEN you're getting into information overload.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
How much radio work have you done? I used to run a radio net and it could get confusing. People stepping all over each other trying to talk at the same time, or someone talking right after another person, so the response to one message gets lost, etc.
In combat it's even more confusing. A datalink gives you all the information right there without having to sort out radio calls.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
But it requires you to take your eye off the ball - you seem to be ignoring that.
Raptor pilots had all the available data on the airspace fused and displayed on a single, easy-to-read screen.
"When I look down at my scope and put my cursor over a [friendly] F-15 or F/A-18, it tells me who they are locked on to," he says. For example, "I could help them out by saying, 'You're double-targeted and there's a group over here untargeted' . . . to make sure we got everybody." F-15 targets will be latent because of the radar sweep.
However, these messages are less and less verbal. "When you watch [tapes of the Alaska] exercise, it's fairly spooky," says Gen. Ronald Keys, chief of Air Combat Command. "There's hardly a word spoken among Raptor pilots." That silence also previews some of the fighter's possible future capabilities.
"Because of the way the aircraft was designed, we have the capability to do more," Keys says. "We can put unmanned combat aircraft systems in there with Raptor. You've got three fairly low-observable UCAS in the battlespace. An air defense system pops up, and I click on a UCAS icon and drag it over [the emitter's location] and click. The UCAS throttles over and jams it, blows it up or whatever."
Link
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Gimme a verbal over a (MFD) visual communication any day of the week in a combat situation.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
"When I look down at my scope and put my cursor over a [friendly] F-15 or F/A-18
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Right. Read the thing.