Hmmm...
The authors of this paper are
theosophists - a religious sect who believe mankind is many millions
of years old.
Theosophists further hold that human civilization, like all other parts of the universe, develops through cycles of seven stages. Blavatsky argued
that humanity, and indeed every reincarnating human soul, evolves through a series of seven "Root Races". Thus in the first age, humans were pure
spirit; in the second age, they were sexless beings inhabiting the now lost continent of Hyperborea; in the third age the giant Lemurians were
informed by spiritual impulses endowing them with human consciousness and sexual reproduction. Modern humans finally developed on the continent of
Atlantis. Since Atlantis was the nadir of the cycle, the present fifth age is a time of reawakening humanity's psychic gifts. The term psychic here
really means the realization of the permeability of consciousness as it had not been known earlier in evolution, although sensed by some more
sensitive individuals of our species.
They have some pretty dodgy views on race, especially about the Jews, and I believe some Nazis were quite keen on their occult philosophy.
They start with the assumption that the Sphinx is over 750,000 years old and then try to support it:
The authors of the report have another point of
view in considering the problem. We have taken the GES age
such as it was indicated by theosophist Yelena Blavatskaya in
one of her basic works (1937). She wrote: “Notice the
indestructible witness of evolution of Human races, from
Divine, and especially Androgynous race, the Egyptian Sphinx,
that mystery of centuries”. According to Blavatskaya the time of
GES erection should exceed 750000 years. Are there some
geological indications which are evidence for such an old age
of the Sphinx? Consider the brief prehistory of the problem.
Essentially the paper says that the Sphinx looks a bit like it was erroded by waves, and the last time sea levels were high enough to do this was
nearly a million years ago, therefore the Sphinx is nearly a million years old. Some crude geology, much hand waving and there you have it.
You would have thought that if the Sphinx was that old it would be dust by now wouldn't you?
Although they share little with Young Earth Creationists philosophy (completely the opposite in some ways), they do use exactly the same methadology -
in that they do away with swathes of scientific data and models but are happy to cherry pick the ones that suit them (such as ancient sea levels).
To be fair, they do call it a "suggested hypothesis", though I would tend to call it junk science.