Sub Pressurization & Decompression Sickness, Serious Replies only please. , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-1-2009 @ 01:52 AM by defcon5
reply to post by Phage



No… It makes sense.
It would really add to the complexity of making a full pressure hull though, as you obviously have to gauge exactly how much air is being consumed, how much is being added, plus how much of each gas is present, constantly. I can see why military subs have stations that constantly sample the air.


reply posted on 16-1-2009 @ 08:16 PM by mdiinican
I'm open water certified, so here goes.

A submarine that maintains 1 atm inside simply has to be made strong enough to resist being crushed by the water pressure outside it. if you plan on going down 10 meters, you'll need it to resist 14 pounds per square inch of inward pressure. This is pretty much linear all the way down, with every 10 meters or so adding on another 15 pounds per square inch of pressure.

Pure oxygen is toxic at high pressures. Don't even think about using it beyond about 30 feet down. Pressurized air is better, but the nitrogen in it will become dissolved in your blood over time, so deep and or extended dives will require decompression stops. Helium and oxygen mixes are better, because helium comes out of solution in blood faster, doesn't dissolve in tissue as fast, and has far less of a narcotic effect than high pressure nitrogen. Trimix is a common blend used for technical diving, and it's got oxygen, helium, and nitrogen.

Here's the dive table I use to determine dive duration, and how long to stay above the surface before diving again.

External source: PADI Dive table

In a spaceship, or, to a lesser degree, the hull is there to keep the air inside from bursting it and escaping, and is pushed on only by the air inside. In a submarine, the hull is there to keep the pressure of the water from crushing it and entering. it is pushed on from the outside. In both cases, the best shapes are spheres and cigar shapes. Submarines tend to take this more literally than aircraft and spacecraft, because spacecraft at most have 1 atm to hold in, while deep sea submersibles may need to hold out a dozen atm of pressure. Usually, a spacecraft will only be pressurized to 5 psi of pure oxygen, making it require a hull only as strong as a submarine intended to dive to 10 feet down.


Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by Phage



What you are saying makes sense, yet there must be something more to it yet. My tank is also rigid (I have used steel and aluminum tanks), yet my air decreases with each BAR that I descend. There is actually a chart that they use in diving, which shows that 33 feet = 2Bar = 2x density = ½ volume, 66 feet = 3BAR = 3x Density = 1/3 volume, etc.

Unless that all simply happens between the first stage regulator and my lungs, I don’t understand why it would happen at all. Besides this I have actually gone down to 100 feet, and watched the PSI in my tank drop on my guages coming right from the high pressure port on my first stage regulator (which bypasses all the other hoses and such), then increase again on ascent.

So for example: I have 3000PSI at the surface, at 99 feet I have around 1000PSI (of course that is off some cause I would have breathed some of it). Then if I return right back to the surface I would be back up near 1500-2000 PSI (of course it would be lower because I consumed more when the air was denser).

See what I mean?


You're wrong. That doesn't happen. I've never seen anything like what you're talking about. You get less use out of your tank because further you go down, the more air is in each breath you take. The air, if you weren't breathing from it, would remain at a constant pressure through the whole trip. Your consumption of the air increases greatly at depth; you use it up twice as fast at 30 feet as you do at the surface, three times as fast at 60.

once the air is outside the tank, it's at the same pressure as the water around it. If it were any less, it would be instantly crushed down until it was. The regulator lets out gas at ambient pressure.

If you were in a sub at 1 atm, you'd use it at the same rate as you would on the surface.

I have to wonder if, at depth, could you hold your breath for much longer, due to the increased oxygen content in each breath? or would the buildup of CO2 cause a need to exhale? I never tried because I'm trained to always maintain a steady breathing rate to prevent lung overexpansion.

Didn't your instructor cover all this during training? we spent a few days on the science of it all.

Anyway, I'd suggest a diving bell type contraption over a real pressure controlled submarine, if you plan on building it. It would be so much easier.


reply posted on 12-2-2010 @ 05:56 AM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by mdiinican
I have to wonder if, at depth, could you hold your breath for much longer, due to the increased oxygen content in each breath? or would the buildup of CO2 cause a need to exhale? I never tried because I'm trained to always maintain a steady breathing rate to prevent lung overexpansion.


I think a lot of people are getting this part wrong, at least sort of. Yes they are right that a normal breath at 10m uses twice as much air out of your tank as at the surface. So therefore you're using the air twice as fast at 10m down right?

Well the assumptions in that are that you're breathing at the same rate (say number of breaths per minute). And I suppose some people do breathe at the same rate they do at the surface, perhaps out of force of habit, and in that case perhaps they are using air at twice the rate as claimed. But this really doesn't follow from the physics. When you take a breath at 10 meters down, yes it's got the same volume but twice the mass as at the surface, but that also means it has twice the oxygen. Now the lungs ability to absorb oxygen isn't 100% efficient, so you probably do use air at a higher rate than at the surface, but the only reason you'd use it at twice the rate is if you didn't slow down your breathing. Personally I find I can slow my rate of breathing down under water dramatically, and still have plenty of oxygen. I think the slower breathing gives all those extra oxygen molecules in each breath more time to come in contact with the lung surface. But then I may be the exception who breathes more slowly underwater, because when I dive with a group of people all at the same depth, I'm often the last one to hit 500psi, so I don't think other people are slowing their breathing down as much as I am. But I suspect this is from a force of habit in breathing rhythm and not due to oxygen requirements.



[edit on 12-2-2010 by Arbitrageur]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 14 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 113 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 42 replies