Thank you for the reply.
Originally posted by LordBucket
I think you may be making this more complicated than it needs to be. The only reason SCUBA gear needs to deliver pressurized air to you is to keep
your lungs from collapsing due to water pressure. If you simply build the hull of your submarine sturdy enough to withstand the pressure, you should
be able to forego any need to pressurize the cabin, as well eliminate as any need to slowly surface to give your body time to eliminate the
nitrogen.
These types of subs are more like a dive bell with a bottom that is either open to the water, or a cockpit that is partially filled with water. They
are all going to be strong enough to go to moderate depths, without needing air pressure to support structure. I figured that as long as I was looking
into the subject I would like to understand how the pressurized ones work as well. I have heard where some folks have actually made pressurized ones
out of old jet fighters, which is neat, but heavy, expensive, and hard to maintain due to saltwater exposure.
You are correct that if you made a bell that ran solely off surface air in a pocket that you took down with you, it would eliminate the problems with
pressurized air, but you create new ones. CO2 retention, and limited air supply being the first two that come to mind. As you do not have cycling air
in that situation, you would slowly poison yourself to death with each exhaled breath.
Originally posted by LordBucket
Yes, but the nitrogen is just to prevent oxygen poisoning from breathing pressurized air. If you don't pressurize the air, there's no need to add
nitrogen.
That is not the way it was explained to me. From my understanding at 2 BAR your air decreases by half (becomes twice as dense), each breath using
twice as much air as at the surface, and your air supply lasts half as long. At each BAR after 2, everything decreases by 1/10th, and continues to do
so the deeper you go. The tanks are filled with normal compressed air, they are not adding extra nitrogen. The reason for the nitrogen build up is
that you are breathing twice (or more) the density of air with each breath. Your body cannot naturally remove that amount of Nitrogen, so it stores it
in body tissue and releases it over time during and after ascent. Changing BAR too rapidly causes the nitrogen to fizz out into the blood stream
causing the Bends. You only have to worry about O2 toxicity if you are running enriched O2 mix (Nitrox). When you want to go deep for extended
periods, then you can displace some of the nitrogen with helium, which is called Tri-Mix. Professional divers displace nitrogen 100% with Helium and
use a Helium/Oxygen mix called Helox, which just so happens to be what was used on the first rescue submarine
Squalus…
Originally posted by LordBucket
...one of the two of us doesn't understand your question. The volume of air in the cabin will remain constant, whether or not it is "pressurized."
Unless I do not understand what you mean by “volume”, this is not true. If I take a cup, flip it over and take an air pocket down with me to 33
feet, the cup (which was full of air at the surface) will only be half full at 2 BAR. If I return to the surface with the cup, when I get to the top,
the cup will again be full of air. If I took the cup back to the bottom, then when I get there I add more air off my compressed tank, and resurface
again, extra air will spill out from the cup on ascent.
Similarly, if you have ever seen them launch a high altitude balloon, you will notice that they only half fill it at ground level. Once it gets to
high altitude the balloon becomes full due to air expansion. As a matter of fact, air expansion is the main reason for it being colder at high
altitude.
In a pressurized cabin that does not happen for some reason that remains a mystery to me. This is really the main question, because an aircraft, a
sub, and the tank I wear on my back should all react the same way IMHO to pressure changes, yet they do not. It makes sense to me that you would add
air to and aircraft, increasing PSI, to maintain 1 BAR at high altitude/Low pressure, but for some reason I cannot think of how they do it when you go
into Higher pressure. I guess they must remove air, but it would seem to me that the air which remains would still be denser then it should be. That
still does not make sense to me because if it were true, then I should be able to decrease the PSI in my tank by half at 2 BAR, and never have to
worry about the bends, yet that is not the case.
Originally posted by LordBucket
Air pressure in a submarine at the bottom of the ocean is the same as the air pressure in a submarine sitting on the surface. The cabin is not
artifically pressurized. They simply build the hull out of a solid piece of metal that can withstand the greater water pressure around it. Whatever
air pressure is on the surface, they simply close the hatch and submerge, maintaining that same internal air pressure at all depths.
There most be something else to this though, because as I stated, when you dive the air becomes denser and takes up less volume. With each breath you
are breathing in denser air, thus extra oxygen and nitrogen. A sub has to replace its air with something, modern military subs can operate for months
without surfacing. Yet after all that down time, a modern sub can make an emergency surface, without harming its occupants or giving them the bends.
Originally posted by LordBucket
...again, one of the two of us doesn't understand your question. How can a sub be "half full of air?" As to your divetank, when you "blow out half
the air" the air pressure in your tank will be half, even though the "volume" of the tank remains the same.
Half the PSI as normal.
Originally posted by LordBucket
There may be some confusion here simply because US dive shops tend to use cubic feet to describe air pressure, which is somewhat
misleading.
Could be, I have noticed that they sometimes seem to explain things in ways that are easy to understand and remember, but may not be the actual
scientific reason.
Originally posted by LordBucket
...if the plans you're working from involve a pressurized cabin...then what I've said above would not apply...but if so, I would expect them to also
include the information you need. If they don't, well...you might consider not using those plans. 
I have seen sets of unpressurized ones, though I have heard of making pressurized kits out of old aircraft fuselages. The whole thing just got me
thinking about how it works, and why certain things work the way that they do. Some of it certainly does not seem to make sense, but some of that
might just be the way that they standardize and simplify things for safety reasons.