It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theflashor
yea it makes sense then but why is the moon moving away whats pulling it? the sun?
Originally posted by noobfun
actually you can just figure it out with Newtons laws of gavity, Einstien only had to get involved in solar system gravity equations becasue 1 planet behaved slightly different, mercury was litterally millimeteres in hundreds of years out of sync, Einsteins work gives us a better understanding of how it effects objects in space but Newtons laws are more then sufficent at this level (and its the suns gravity that hold us and them in place in orbit, plaentary gravity isnt enough to seriously effect other planets)
Originally posted by noobfun
so what your basically arguing is that gravity isnt real or is some how wrong,
Originally posted by noobfun
your just dragging in space time etc to try and take a position of authority to argue against DJMessiah points
Originally posted by noobfun
your play for authority fails sorry, when you walk off a building and start floating maybe then ill take your argument seriously
Originally posted by theflashor
but how can just 1 magnetic pull keep a planet in orbit you need the counter balance
Johannes Kepler?
Originally posted by spines
I think there are some misunderstandings here. I wish I could remember the guys name right now.
Anyway, there was this beautiful, mathmatically 'correct', explination for the way in which the planets orbited the sun a few centuries ago (I mentioned it up before). The math worked, it explained the planets observable movements in relation to one another, to the earth and the sun. But in order for it to work the planets all had to move in orbit around the sun and also in other, much smaller, individual orbits around an invisible point near to each of them.
why it was the best understanding they had back then
For some reason we can all look back on people from hundreds of years ago and giggle about how they could possibly believe such things.
and disparaging his understanding by pulling in space time and his understanding of physcis formula then asserting your more correct, you may not have ment it that way but it read that way and all we can go is your wording
Why is everyone so god damn quick to think the worst on this site? I didn't know every rebutal had to be prefixed with intent and apologies. I adressed DJMessiah because he was the one I was talking to.
becasue we can still use newtonian physics to accuratley calculate the poistion of bodies in orbit quite accuratley and over large periods of given time
Anyway, I was brining up space/time because it is relevant. The nature of what 'space' is or isn't is crucial to the point I was trying to make: That we shouldn't be so sure of our understanding of how it all works. If we can't understand the nature of 'space', how can we say that we are correct in how we think things interact with and/or within this space?
its the best understanding we presently have and it works extremley well
I still think it is funny how sure everyone is that our current human understanding is right; must be right! The math works damnit, how could we possibly be wrong? Our collective knowing is truly the jewel of this vast universe...
thanks i was looking for the jumping lamb with 'gravity its only a theory' underneath but couldnt find it
Cute picture.
your words implied it and we only have your words to go on
How about we stop assuming for three seconds and not stick an entire argument into my mouth that I never made. You basically attack my position by making up something that I never said and then tell me why my thoughts are wrong because of that.
Originally posted by theflashor
I still think the balance has to be to perfect and there must be somthing else at play other then our own understandings
remember scientific theory and general language theory are different
Its still only theory based on our knowledge and understanding...
thats exactly what makes science so much fun theres always more
Remember we prob only know 1% of what there is to know
Earth may be in the same section of 'space' as it was the previous year, but mars isn't. And not just mars, but all the major bodies in our solar system. So why is it that when earth reaches x and the rest of the equation is fudged...the answer comes out to be the same?
Originally posted by theflashor
no need to insult me, i do understand the theory i just feel that to still be in the same orbit now after millions and millions of years! i just strongly beleive that theres more to it than gravity.
becasue it gravity, and becasue it screws around with space distorting it and becasue its the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces
Why does gravity behave the way it does?!
ummm no, its not a collection of forces it is only one force
Can the force gravity be broken down into a more simple series of different forces?!
science is ever changing alway growing always improving, when your talking a theory its proven so its always gonna be motly right even if some of the details change becasue of new observances
I personally beleive that far to many people beleive what scientists say and take it as gospal.
and thats the whole point
Scientists are finding things in space all the time which tests their beleives and understandings.