I like how the witnesses of the mystery lights all have names but the
alleged hoaxer in Phoenix and the balloon-eyewitness are shrouded
and not named.

Also isn't this a different Phoenix case?! "The Phoenix Lights" was
a name adopted in 1997 to an unexplained case of lights in the sky.
I don't remember them being red either.

The one in reference is in 2008. Hoax or no hoax. I feel an attempt
at lessening the original "Phoenix Lights" importance and credibility.

Disinformation, unclear facts and no names assigned to those
who were supposedly first hand witnesses to the hoax.

Even from an objective view how can read this and conclude 100%,
that this was a hoax. You smell that?!

It's BS.





[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

Originally posted by cluckerspud
I like how the witnesses of the mystery lights all have names but the
alleged hoaxer in Phoenix and the balloon-eyewitness are shrouded
and not named.

Also isn't this a different Phoenix case?! "The Phoenix Lights" was
a name adopted in 1997 to an unexplained case of lights in the sky.
I don't remember them being red either.

The one in reference is in 2008. Hoax or no hoax. I feel an attempt
at lessening the original "Phoenix Lights" importance and credibility.

Disinformation, unclear facts and no names assigned to those
who were supposedly first hand witnesses to the hoax.

Even from an objective view how can read this and conclude 100%,
that this was a hoax. You smell that?!

It's BS.





[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by cluckerspud]

Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

I added the videos and wanted to give this one a bump I don't know if people don't care about this one or what?

Originally posted by alyosha1981
Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

It's to keep us with in the boundaries of our elite thinkers.
A set parameter. Hear me out.

They don't want us to know what is out there, because I think
the existence to UFO's means they have to stop lying. It's hard
to stop the lie once it is so big. Also admitting to their existence
could prove realms of science unimaginable. Free energy and so
on.

Reasons for articles like this are to keep people who may believe in
anything off this rock is stupid, and it classifies you as a whacko.

Therefore we get the Science Channel that tells us how massive,
expansive, unpredictable and empty space is. No life, just plenty
of beautiful galaxies, stars, nebulas, blackholes, dark matter, super
novas, moons, gasses etc. But no life. That would be crazy, now sit
down, it must be a road flare.

I think any hoaxers should be sought out, brought to light and charged
with "Obstructing Science". Also tying up the 911 phone line and wasting
the time of any officers involved.

Notice how nothing will be done to find out who the hoaxer is.
But they will sure find out who is crazy and saw the lights.
They'll give you there full name, put em on TV and tell you
what town they live in.

Originally posted by cluckerspud

Originally posted by alyosha1981
Exactly what I'm trying to point out! what is the true reason for articles like this one is it in fact more disinformation?

It's to keep us with in the boundaries of our elite thinkers.
A set parameter. Hear me out.

They don't want us to know what is out there, because I think
the existence to UFO's means they have to stop lying. It's hard
to stop the lie once it is so big. Also admitting to their existence
could prove realms of science unimaginable. Free energy and so
on.

Reasons for articles like this are to keep people who may believe in
anything off this rock is stupid, and it classifies you as a whacko.

Therefore we get the Science Channel that tells us how massive,
expansive, unpredictable and empty space is. No life, just plenty
of beautiful galaxies, stars, nebulas, blackholes, dark matter, super
novas, moons, gasses etc. But no life. That would be crazy, now sit
down, it must be a road flare.

I think any hoaxers should be sought out, brought to light and charged
with "Obstructing Science". Also tying up the 911 phone line and wasting
the time of any officers involved.

Notice how nothing will be done to find out who the hoaxer is.
But they will sure find out who is crazy and saw the lights.
They'll give you there full name, put em on TV and tell you
what town they live in.

I agree, but didn't UFO hunter's debunk the flair theory? I believe this is disinformation pure and simple

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I agree, but didn't UFO hunter's debunk the flair theory? I believe this is disinformation pure and simple

I also don't know about the flair theory being debunked.
I have mixed feelings with UFO Hunters. I was excited to
see the show at first, but was kind of let down.

I will certainly research in the next few days. If you get
anything or hear anything I look forward to hearing.

Back to disinformation...
Absolutely. Even if they claim it's not.