My Own Religion, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 04:03 PM by TruthParadox
reply to post by FritosBBQTwist



I wouldn't call that a religion, more of a philosophy.
It's never going to happen though. There has to be a balance. If everyone is on one side of the line then someone will cross the line just to be different.
We naturally balance each other out. "Good" exists because there is "evil", but they're not what they appear to be on the surface - they both seek the same general goals.
Not everyone wants peace so there will never be a utopia.



reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 06:39 PM by FritosBBQTwist
This is my other thread saying that there needs to be a balance between "good" and "evil".

www.abovetopsecret.com...'

Someone posted and said that they hope I do not have that idea concreted in my head which was a very good point - even if they did not catch my drift anyways

Call my "philosophy" what you want. Call a religion what you want. Same difference.

I am a Christian by birth and have attended church and classes, but not much at all recently. In fact, not at all.

Yes - let us be realistic. There is evil. It seems like there will always be evil. THAT sounds realistic.

As true as it may be, after thinking about it, it does not seem the right code to live by. In a universe that is unexplainable, everything is possible. We have yet to touch or ever touch "everything" that is learn able.

I used to be against organized religion. I still am to a point. I used to even think it is a joke, and still do believe some of its followers are tools. That is the reason I posted this. There is no giant book of "lies" (My opinion referring to past historical books). There are no rules such as fasting. The thing is, this is a "theory". So is the fact that good does not exist without evil. Now, WHY would you pick the THEORY - something that IS NOT PROVEN - over something that could actually make the world a better place?

Also - what type of logic is it to say you are a "good" person but none of your actions really matter because they will be canceled out by an "evil" person?

The lesson in my OP was to say point out that we should just try to make the world a better place. The smallest actions can truly affect someones life for the better.

What makes this balance have to include violence? Could the balance be a difference of ideas, that balance each other, WITHOUT having anything to do with spewing hate/violence/bad emotions?

There is always a time to joke. A favorite quote of mine is "Take everything in moderation, even moderation" or whatever. I am not some tree hugging hippie. Even with this in my mind - I am SURE to hurt feelings in the future. The goal is still to make a positive impact.

Sorry for the long post


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 07:52 PM by Anonymous ATS




reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 10:06 PM by FritosBBQTwist
By no means when I said technology, It would be used in the way you portray. Down the road it could be possible to eliminate certain traits that cause psycho like symptoms etc. I do not see how that would eliminate the worlds free will if such symptoms were removed. edit - Also...technology can mean anything. Such as very efficient energy use.

I do not believe in "Utopia" - or at least not formed by man. I do see something close to it though.

Do you doubt the possibility of a future, 100, 200, 300, 400, and so on years down the road (If we do not become extinct from natural causes), where crime rates are at an all time low - and I mean VERY low, economy is booming where the world and its citizens all have a good start in life - not one in extreme poverty? Do you think that there will never be a world order that actually works?

I believe in survival of the fittest as well. An example relating to nowadays "Weak" people (No offense to anyone), could possibly be people born with diseases leaving them to die? Could this not be cured 99.99% of the time or more?

I am not naive and I understand that there will ALWAYS be a crime. There will ALWAYS be weak. Are you saying though that the world situation will never get better than it is now? Then who is to say (goes both ways to me and you) that this "better world" could go to great points?

In my OP, when saying things such as eternal happiness from god etc, I was using that as a possible way to help get my point across, whether that has failed or not, it is not meant to be taken literal.

You say it would be boring with some bad in life...I can joke quite well with others, hold arguments, and even curse at others in a way that still does not hold hate or violence, yet is still "fun".

Do some of you seriously think it is impossible for our race to actually come to a point in our lives where we do not have genocide and starvation across the world?

Thank you guys for the discussion. I try to educate myself while others at the same time if possible

[edit on 7-1-2009 by FritosBBQTwist]

[edit on 7-1-2009 by FritosBBQTwist]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^