posted on Jan, 2 2009 @ 12:22 AM
reply to post by cancerian42
The original post and the subsequent discussion causes me great distress and somewhat angers me as I am a public school educator and college prof.
------ that being said their is some merit to the points made I would like to address those on a point by point basis first though Id like to point
out that this thread primarily refers to social studies and history courses--
1) Micromanaging not from the administration but from the state. We are very much told what to teach ..through extensive documents that we must almost
memorize AND document HOW we are following the prescribed procedure
2) Standardized tests-- if we do not teach according to the curriculum our students fail the test then we are chastised as not doing our job
3) special ed--- students who cant or wont keep up are put into special classes given easier tests and heaven forbid we fail one that leads to a
mountain of paper work and a discussion/investigation from the board therefore its just practical to do what your told and follow protocal
4) our own education --- we have all been brainwashed to see history a certain way for instance my teachers thought FDR hung the moon and shared that
with us we were also taught Nixon was the greatest criminal of all time both of these scenarios are incorrect FDR -- was not the savior he has been
made out to be and Nixon was not the scumbag he was made out to be
WHATS BEING DONE
well speaking for myself I always try to present both sides of all historical situation question all the answers...sort of speak for example I
sometimes teach the War Between the states from a southern POV .....or at least present their POV......I teach many theories concerning Kennedy
assassination......the effects of business on politics and the effects of unions on business
IN SHORT dont lump all teachers together their are more of us than you think trying give kids different opinions and different ways of looking at
things