Whats going on at yellowstone?

Originally posted by shikori
reply to post by shikori

 

Sweet irony guys.
Look at the time those quakes started and when this asteroid whizzed by.

(emphasis is mine)

Considering many asteroids are made of iron, was that a pun you made?

reply to post by UtahRosebud


From that article

"In particular, we identify triggered microearthquakes in the Coso Geothermal Field," they reported in Geophysical Research Letters. "This is one of the most seismically active regions in California," they added.

"At least four microearthquakes at shallow depth (under 3 km or 1.8 miles) in the Coso Geothermal Field were likely triggered by teleseismic waves from the Chile earthquake."

Oh right, now they blame earthquakes in Chile for the damage they do by Geothermal extraction. Hm. I call BS. 4 microquakes? And you expect me to believe that they can state that 4 MICRO quakes in - their words - a seismically active area were caused by Chile. BS, BS, BS, BS and more BS.

Give me a few days and I can dig up microquakes all over the States in fracking and geothermal areas and find that they were all caused by a bigger earthquake somewhere else in the world. Yup, let's palm off our problems as being caused by someone else. The quakes at Guy? Probably cause by the recent number of quakes in Greece. etc.

Scientists......Sheesh. (How much did they paid for this study by the way?)

Magnitude 2.4
Date-Time Friday, February 11, 2011 at 02:07:31 UTC
Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 07:07:31 PM at epicenter

Location 44.477°N, 110.578°W
Depth 2.5 km (1.6 miles) (poorly constrained)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances 47 km (29 miles) ESE (116°) from West Yellowstone, MT
60 km (38 miles) E (92°) from Island Park, ID
63 km (39 miles) S (170°) from Gardiner, MT
428 km (266 miles) NNE (14°) from Salt Lake City, UT

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 1.2 km (0.7 miles); depth +/- 19.8 km (12.3 miles)
Parameters NST= 11, Nph= 11, Dmin=15 km, Rmss=0.37 sec, Gp= 76°,
M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=0
Source University of Utah Seismograph Stations

Event ID uu00005713




So what do you think? Will it stick? So far, seismos are a couple minutes behind, so I don't know if its there or not!

reply to post by westcoast


No, it probably wont. In fact it has not. Sorry that scratch card did not win. Try again please.

B207.PB..EHZ.2011.042

reply to post by westcoast
Seems like it went away. Computer problems again?

I only find the following quakes:

MAG DATE LOCAL-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION

0.7 2011/02/09 20:55:32 44.753N 110.925W 9.6 18 km (11 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/09 17:07:11 45.021N 111.075W 8.6 28 km (18 mi) W of Gardiner, MT
0.3 2011/02/09 14:43:08 44.547N 111.010W 13.0 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.1 2011/02/09 14:16:42 44.539N 111.017W 13.1 15 km (10 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/09 13:24:05 44.547N 111.020W 12.9 14 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 13:19:14 44.550N 111.014W 13.5 14 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2011/02/09 13:15:40 44.544N 111.014W 12.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2011/02/09 13:15:40 44.544N 111.014W 12.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 13:15:09 44.549N 111.014W 12.6 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 12:40:01 44.543N 111.016W 11.5 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2011/02/08 18:43:20 44.448N 110.538W 3.7 51 km (32 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2011/02/08 18:42:53 44.393N 110.520W 0.3 55 km (34 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.3 2011/02/07 01:12:08 44.571N 111.035W 7.1 12 km ( 7 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/05 09:21:47 44.752N 111.110W 6.9 10 km ( 6 mi) N of West Yellowstone, MT
0.4 2011/02/04 18:37:10 44.563N 110.976W 4.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2011/02/04 12:45:13 44.283N 110.442W 7.7 68 km (42 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT

On MCID there is a quake at 23:24 ish UTC. It seems to originate south of the park, yet I don't see anything on the US map to match it with. No big deal.

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by UtahRosebud

 

From that article

"In particular, we identify triggered microearthquakes in the Coso Geothermal Field," they reported in Geophysical Research Letters. "This is one of the most seismically active regions in California," they added.

"At least four microearthquakes at shallow depth (under 3 km or 1.8 miles) in the Coso Geothermal Field were likely triggered by teleseismic waves from the Chile earthquake."

Oh right, now they blame earthquakes in Chile for the damage they do by Geothermal extraction. Hm. I call BS. 4 microquakes? And you expect me to believe that they can state that 4 MICRO quakes in - their words - a seismically active area were caused by Chile. BS, BS, BS, BS and more BS.

Give me a few days and I can dig up microquakes all over the States in fracking and geothermal areas and find that they were all caused by a bigger earthquake somewhere else in the world. Yup, let's palm off our problems as being caused by someone else. The quakes at Guy? Probably cause by the recent number of quakes in Greece. etc.

Scientists......Sheesh. (How much did they paid for this study by the way?)

edit on 10/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)

Well c'mon now... we cannot seriously hold the oil & fracking drillers responsible. So lets blame it on another continent and mother nature. At this point, I won't be surprised if we see a MSM report blaming those trapped Chilean miners for some quakes appearing somewhere.

Two major points to keep in mind about Yellowstone.

1. The extreme amount of underground drilling in Wyoming that is designed to rupture the crust and create a fissure for the magma to escape out of the chamber and,

2. There are several ways to exert pressure on the magma chamber. Pressure on one side of a plate, has to be released somewhere else. HAARP has a variety of different ways that it can do this.

So, the extreme amount of drilling that has been going on in Wyoming for several years now (by the US Navy) should be extremely worrisome to everyone.

Originally posted by Roald
reply to post by westcoast

 

Seems like it went away. Computer problems again?

I only find the following quakes:

MAG DATE LOCAL-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION

0.7 2011/02/09 20:55:32 44.753N 110.925W 9.6 18 km (11 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/09 17:07:11 45.021N 111.075W 8.6 28 km (18 mi) W of Gardiner, MT
0.3 2011/02/09 14:43:08 44.547N 111.010W 13.0 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.1 2011/02/09 14:16:42 44.539N 111.017W 13.1 15 km (10 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/09 13:24:05 44.547N 111.020W 12.9 14 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 13:19:14 44.550N 111.014W 13.5 14 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2011/02/09 13:15:40 44.544N 111.014W 12.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2011/02/09 13:15:40 44.544N 111.014W 12.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 13:15:09 44.549N 111.014W 12.6 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2011/02/09 12:40:01 44.543N 111.016W 11.5 15 km ( 9 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2011/02/08 18:43:20 44.448N 110.538W 3.7 51 km (32 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2011/02/08 18:42:53 44.393N 110.520W 0.3 55 km (34 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.3 2011/02/07 01:12:08 44.571N 111.035W 7.1 12 km ( 7 mi) SSE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2011/02/05 09:21:47 44.752N 111.110W 6.9 10 km ( 6 mi) N of West Yellowstone, MT
0.4 2011/02/04 18:37:10 44.563N 110.976W 4.4 15 km ( 9 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2011/02/04 12:45:13 44.283N 110.442W 7.7 68 km (42 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT

No Idont think so. There is something on the webicorder.

Originally posted by Red Cloak
Two major points to keep in mind about Yellowstone.

1. The extreme amount of underground drilling in Wyoming that is designed to rupture the crust and create a fissure for the magma to escape out of the chamber and,

2. There are several ways to exert pressure on the magma chamber. Pressure on one side of a plate, has to be released somewhere else. HAARP has a variety of different ways that it can do this.

So, the extreme amount of drilling that has been going on in Wyoming for several years now (by the US Navy) should be extremely worrisome to everyone.

In this post I asked you the question below which you have failed to answer. I ask it again. If you are unable to answer it then kindly refrain from pushing this idea on this thread which whilst on a conspiracy site is concerned with scientific facts not scientific fiction.

In addition at what depth do you consider the magma chamber to be that fracking will put pressure on the side of it? Whilst answering that question please indicate why you consider the the US Navy would wish to do this?

The $1m Question

I have yet to find anyone who can answer the following question for which, if I was James Randi, I would offer one million dollars.

"Can you please explain to me, in scientific terms with calculations and diagrams how a radio frequency generator (HAARP) with a maximum wattage can create 'pressures' (please define) in Yellowstone, or indeed anywhere else in the world, that can cause earthquakes of sufficient size to 'set off' Yellowstone."

I look forward to a mini scientific dissertation on the subject by way of reply. You can be as technical as you like. Thanks.

reply to post by Robin Marks


Him fella here.



Can see it in the listings yet. Definitely a local quake

Also shows (just) on Moose Ponds - Grand Teton park

MOOW.IW..BHZ.2011.041

How close are they to each other?

Originally posted by PuterMan

Originally posted by Red Cloak
Two major points to keep in mind about Yellowstone.

1. The extreme amount of underground drilling in Wyoming that is designed to rupture the crust and create a fissure for the magma to escape out of the chamber and,

2. There are several ways to exert pressure on the magma chamber. Pressure on one side of a plate, has to be released somewhere else. HAARP has a variety of different ways that it can do this.

So, the extreme amount of drilling that has been going on in Wyoming for several years now (by the US Navy) should be extremely worrisome to everyone.

In this post I asked you the question below which you have failed to answer. I ask it again. If you are unable to answer it then kindly refrain from pushing this idea on this thread which whilst on a conspiracy site is concerned with scientific facts not scientific fiction.

In addition at what depth do you consider the magma chamber to be that fracking will put pressure on the side of it? Whilst answering that question please indicate why you consider the the US Navy would wish to do this?

The $1m Question

I have yet to find anyone who can answer the following question for which, if I was James Randi, I would offer one million dollars.

"Can you please explain to me, in scientific terms with calculations and diagrams how a radio frequency generator (HAARP) with a maximum wattage can create 'pressures' (please define) in Yellowstone, or indeed anywhere else in the world, that can cause earthquakes of sufficient size to 'set off' Yellowstone."

I look forward to a mini scientific dissertation on the subject by way of reply. You can be as technical as you like. Thanks.

James Randi is a con man and skeptics have lower IQs than non-skeptics.

reply to post by Red Cloak


What exactly does the (dubious) fact that James Randi may be a conman have to do with proving your point?

The fact that that he offers money for people to prove their point puts the onus on them and does not make him a conman.

Could you point me to the study where you find this conclusion that sceptics are less intelligent that believers? That should be interesting reading.

In the meantime - please answer the question.

James Randi is a con man and skeptics have lower IQs than non-skeptics.

I fail to see how being a skeptic or non skeptic is in any way related to intelligence.

Firstly you would need to define who is a skeptic. Anyone not following an official line maybe? But according to dictionary.com it is the following:
a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual.

The way I see it anyone who spends time looking into a subject matter and thus forming an opinion whether it be following the official line or an alternate view requires intellectual reasoning. To say either of those sides of the coin are more intelligent than the other is at best simplistic.

Now I could say that to follow the official line does not necessarily require intellectual reasoning, the work has been done, your peers have accepted it and you stand by your peers having given little thought to the subject, yet this is not what I see here on ATS, what I actually see are often very well thought out intellectual arguments from both skeptics and non skeptics.

Could you please show me your research on this subject its very interesting.

VIVE LA REVOLUTION!

Magnitude 4.6 - YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING

Now lets see how long this one last on the list.


Magnitude 4.6 - YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
2011 February 12 02:36:09 UTC

Earthquake Details

* This is a computer-generated message -- this event has not yet been reviewed by a seismologist.

Magnitude 4.6
Date-Time

* Saturday, February 12, 2011 at 02:36:09 UTC
* Friday, February 11, 2011 at 07:36:09 PM at epicenter

Location 44.270°N, 110.973°W
Depth 15.5 km (9.6 miles)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances

* 32 km (20 miles) ENE (58°) from Warm River, ID
* 39 km (24 miles) SE (131°) from Island Park, ID
* 42 km (26 miles) NE (44°) from Drummond, ID
* 398 km (247 miles) N (11°) from Salt Lake City, UT

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 1.8 km (1.1 miles); depth +/- 5.7 km (3.5 miles)
Parameters NST= 8, Nph= 8, Dmin=53 km, Rmss=0.26 sec, Gp=140°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=0
Source

* University of Utah Seismograph Stations

Event ID uu00005729

reply to post by Roald


Well, I found this one. Is the other one gone ALREADY????? Geesh....

ude 2.5 - duration magnitude (Md)
Time Friday, February 11, 2011 at 7:38:18 PM (MST)
Saturday, February 12, 2011 at 2:38:18 (UTC)
Distance from Lehi, UT - 6 km (3 miles) W (274 degrees)
Bluffdale, UT - 8 km (5 miles) SSE (167 degrees)
Saratoga Springs, UT - 9 km (5 miles) NNW (348 degrees)
Highland, UT - 11 km (7 miles) W (262 degrees)
Provo, UT - 29 km (18 miles) NW (309 degrees)

Coordinates 40 deg. 24.3 min. N (40.405N), 111 deg. 55.4 min. W (111.924W)
Depth 0.4 km (0.2 miles)
Location Quality Fair
Location Quality Parameters Nst= 60, Nph= 60, Dmin=6 km, Rmss=0.44 sec, Erho=0.6 km, Erzz=5.2 km, Gp=43.2 degrees
Event ID# uu00005730

reply to post by westcoast
Yes, it's already gone.
They might still have some problems with their systems.
Or is it buffaloes again?

Ah. I don't see anything on the seismo at Pitchstone Plateau. Just some small things on Madison River and Old Faithful earlier.

Periodically, applications are made for geothermal leases in Known Geothermal Resource Areas (KGRAs) outside the park, such as in the Island Park KGRA west of the park, and the Corwin Springs KGRA north of YNP near LaDuke Hot Springs.

Idaho Geothermal leases
island park

Just sayin' -
When these start disappearing off the official page -
but we still see them on the seismograph... odd?

DELETED NOTIFICATION ==
***This event has been deleted after review by a seismologist.***
Geographic coordinates: 44.270N, 110.973W Magnitude:
4.6 Universal Time (UTC):
12 Feb 2011 02:36:09 Time near the Epicenter:
11 Feb 2011 19:36:09
Location with respect to nearby cities:
32 km (20 miles) ENE (58 degrees) of Warm River, ID
39 km (24 miles) SE (131 degrees) of Island Park, ID
42 km (26 miles) NE (44 degrees) of Drummond, ID

Just found this on my Twitter...I've subscribed to EQTW tweets.

4.6 - YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:36:09 UTCLat/Lon: 44.2703/-110.973Depth: 15.5
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Someone will want to repost it in full..most likely.

Toni