Big pharma pushing Adderall and Ritalin as productivity boosters for humans, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 9-12-2008 @ 03:14 AM by RedGolem

Big pharma pushing Adderall and Ritalin as productivity boosters for humans


www.blacklistednews.com
Healthy people should have the right to boost their brains with pills, like those prescribed for hyperactive kids or memory-impaired older folks, several scientists contend in a provocative commentary.

College students are already illegally taking prescription stimulants like Ritalin to help them study, and demand for such drugs is likely to grow elsewhere, they say.

"We should welcome new methods of improving our brain function," and doing it with pills is no more morally objectionable
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.naturalnews.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
ADHD is wide spread misinfo spread by the new world order.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 03:41 AM by runetang
People are going to do it anyway. I hope they do make it legal and available for all people. Here's why.

If they make Adderall and Ritalin legal and available, people will use it INSTEAD OF stimulant drugs such as Cocaine, Crystal Meth, Speed, and Crank.

While Adderall is basically a pre-cursor to Crystal Meth in itself, it is a safer, healthier alternative by far. It is made with a clean process, not an illegal, dirty, home-made process, or as I like to call it "Kitchen Chemistry". Adderall is really quite similar in its psychoactive affect on humans to Crystal Methamphetamine, otherwise known as ice, crystal, tina, glass, etc. However, it does not damage the brain and body as badly nor as quickly as the Crystal Methamphetamine does.

This is the main reason it should be legalized in my opinion. I mean.. talk about KILLING the Crystal Meth market, only die-hard addicts would continue to use, and even less people who mke the stuff would still be making it. Thus, the price of it would go up really high, and it would be really hard to find. This will just promote even MORE to abandon it for the LEGAL alternative, Adderall, if it were made legal.

You could really take a bite out of that criminal market this way, it would be so simple. This can also be done on a few different other drugs and drug categories. It is a progressive, new approach, but it's obvious that the "war on drugs" has not succeeded and will never totally succeed. Therefore we need something new and better. I feel this approach is the answer.

So, legal Adderall pills available @ the Pharmacy over the counter. This kills the Crystal Meth market.

Then, legalize Marijuana, and sell it in pre-rolled cigarette packs @ Gas Stations. This kills the Weed market, no reason to have a clandestine growth operation if it's legal. Possessing some ridiculously large amount should still be illegal though, taking it over country borders should still be illegal, and possessing any kind of Marijuana that does not have the official markings on the packaging (to show it has been taxed and counted) should still be illegal.

Then you simply make a low dose pain medication which normally is prescription only OVER THE COUNTER. This will help kill the whole market behind subverting and selling of prescription pills. For instance, they should make packages of .. 12 vicodin regular strength, over the counter. You'd have to ASK the Pharmacist for it, then they'd get it from their side of the counter you see. Then they'd write your name down or if its already written, put a mark beside it. You can only buy X amount of boxes in a month. This is what they already do in Canada with Codiene/Tylonal combination pills. This would cut down TREMENDOUSLY on all kinds of crime and problems. I could write a whole thread about just this one.

Lastly, they should have a weak, low dose, over the counter anxiety medication, attainable in the same fashion as the pain medicine in the paragraph above this one. You know .. something like five milligrams of valium in a single pill, with 12 in a pack, etc. Since your name is taken each time and there are maximum limits on how many packs of each you can get in a week or a month, the overall abuse potential would be low.

This would end the war on drugs. This would be great .. we'd be like a gigantic Holland, except even BETTER!

[edit on 12/9/2008 by runetang]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 03:58 AM by ::.mika.::
reply to post by runetang


it sounds like you are looking for excuse to chose cholera over pest.

(chose life)


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 04:10 AM by dizziedame
This is one of those subject I can never agree with myself about. I'm of two minds going in opposite directions.

I agree that big pharmacy is a money making machine that has little regard for human life. Their goal is the almighty profit.

As far as control of the populous i don't believe that is the foremost concern except where it creates the profits. Nothing sinister there. We'll, don't all businesses want profit?

If I can take a drug in the morning and finish a book I've been attempting to write for years I'm all for popping that little pill.

I already take memory enhancing drugs, and drugs to enhance me physically so that I might digest my food better and also to help my other bodily functions. My drug bill is at least $1,200.00 each month.

I'm just waiting for a drug that will erase a few years from my skin and and a drug that really will stop my daily pain without my being in a drugged state all the time.

That being said..........keep churning out those good drugs big pharmacy.

Now, this is where it gets dicey with me. My 9 month beautiful great granddaughter is being forced to get flu vaccine and her other shots this week. That bit of information slipped out to my ear shot last night.

Fear gripped my entire being. OMG not my great granddaughter. I was livid. I finally settled down after popping one of pharmacy's best selling pills to calm me down. It is a prescribed medication. One of my life enhancer drugs.

So, here I go in circles chasing my tail. One one hand I'm saying I love you big pharmacy and on the other hand I'm damming you. How dare you advise we poke pills down our children's throats.

Just please keep doing research and find a new pill to make my life better.

Chasing my own tail is no fun. I don't think I will ever be able to come to a single conclusion concerning drugs and our uses or need of them.



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 04:13 AM by Solomons
reply to post by runetang



legalize marijuana...yet it has to be government stamped and taxed? its a plant! how can anyone think the government controlling and taxing plants is normal for a society is beyond me...


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 05:41 AM by RedGolem
reply to post by dizziedame



Dizziedeme
I do wish you all the best health, and your great grand daughter. The problem is the drug companies, don't necessarily want the same thing. Even with what you are calling the good drugs. Hear is part of my point.

Trudeau says in his book that the Food and Drug Administration is actively banning all-natural cures so that consumers are forced to buy drugs and therefore support the drug industry. He also says that there are all-natural cures for serious ailments such as cancer, attention deficit disorder, arthritis, acid reflux disease, herpes, and many other diseases. He writes that "It's all about the money! See why I am mad as all hell and not going to take it anymore??" (Updated Ed., p. 16)

Trudeau has no medical training or expertise, although he says that this fact makes him the most qualified to make these claims, as he is not a part of the pharmaceutical industry, American Medical Association, or FDA. His book refers to various studies supporting its claims, only vaguely, without specific citations to verify them. He also says that the book's claims are only his opinions, and in the chapter "I Should Be Dead Now" that there are virtually no medical facts.xc


The point of that is that the drug companies don't necessarily want you to be healthy. Healthy people don't buy there drugs. They want you in a constant state of being sick. Sick people buy drugs.
Drug companies don't invest in a drug that cures people, why?
Because when a drug cures people, they don't half to take it any more.

sorce wiki

[edit on 9-12-2008 by RedGolem]


reply posted on 13-12-2008 @ 12:08 AM by blowfishdl
I used to take Adderall for ADHD and it did help me out a LOT. With that said I have hyperactivity and attention deficit disorder. I experience extreme amounts of attention deficiency. ADHD can be beneficial if you have many tasks to be completed at once, but many times there is one large goal and someone with this issue cannot focus all of his/her attention on the one goal.

I don't believe that these drugs should be distributed amongst the general public. Adderall is actually chemically addictive if abused, and should only be taken by those who suffer from attention deficiency. If you do not and you take Adderall you are likely to become a complete walking Zombie.

I stopped taking Adderall and although complete lack of productivity, I simply cannot afford this medicine. It costs over $240 a month if you do not have insurance, and I was laid off of a really nice job so I do not have insurance myself anymore. If I did not stop taking Adderall previously to being laid off, I would be SOL and suffering from chemical withdrawal on top of my loss of job.

Withdrawal symptoms are basically dizziness, nausea, morning heart burn, and vertigo throughout the day.

The question is, is it worth it? If I was in college I would NEED it and honestly I never finished college because of my ADHD and because I stopping taking this medicine. However, with college in my past I have an inner-conflict as to whether or not this medicine is the correct thing for me to do.



reply posted on 13-12-2008 @ 02:56 AM by RedGolem
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge



zero
you do bring up a good point, with the side effects. The drug companies do some times list death as a side effect with a drug. Not for the drugs that have been talked about here, but would a drug be approved that has death listed as a side effect?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags