It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rush969
Hey "Jailhouse", very interesting post!!
Can we know where you are, or your nationality?
Are you with some secret service agency?
Are you related in any way to Al Qaeda?
Maybe you can´t answer these questions but you said, "ask me what you want to know".
So I´m asking.
Originally posted by RFBurns
The thing about all these alledged 9/11 websites with other points of view, is that all of them contain information that seems to be swayed to lean to only one side of the opinion. Why is that? If they are honest, why not do side by side data comparisons and allow the reader/researcher come to their own conclusions?
Who can say for certian than any of them, or even the official conclusion is correct? Thats the part that always seems to be missing, that one piece of evidence, proof, unquestionable part that affirms one is the truth, and the other is merely tabloid tall tale chatter batter.Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by rush969
Well cashlink. I give up!! I don´t think there´s any point in continuing this discussion. You will not accept any of my references however trustworthy they may seem to anyone, and you insist on disqualifying and mocking any idea that I present. So I guess we are only wasting each other´s time.
If I give you a reference to CNN, CBS, Wikipedia, BBC, FBI, FAA, NTSB, UN, etc... You consider them unacceptable and liars. Witnesses, reporters, NIST, FEMA, are ALL part of the “inside job”, so there´s no trustworthy source that you will accept any information from!! It´s obvious I will not convince you of anything and neither will you, so carry on and enjoy your research.
The websites that you give references to are all respectable but you have to consider they represent a small minority of the professionals on those fields anyway.
Originally posted by cashlinkDo “you” have proof that is man on this tape is Bin Laden?
Do “you” have proof that this is so call tape is real, and not made up, in some CIA or FBI back room with phony actors? I can hire a man to read a script and record it and give it to the Press and tell them HEY THIS IS BIN LADEN, HE SAID HE DID THE ATTACKS ON 911! Please! Where is your proof
Originally posted by mmiichael
To clarify my position, I've read books, articles, endless discussion online questioning the Official version of 9/11. I read what the self-proclaimed debunkers have to say, many linked to here
www.debunking911.com...
I also discuss the reporting phenomenon with people still active in publishing, some of whom I've known for decades.
Weighing it all in, I'll give some points to those who question the Official version. Not usually discussed, one of the biggest holes is the project funding sources the US avoids discussing. And some things are not quite right about the flight training school scenario.
But the destruction of the WTC Towers due to airlines filled with fuel flying into them, falls completely in line with the laws of physics and thermodynamics as demonstrated by experts in the field, most with no apparent agenda either way,
I'm sorry I don't have the time and resources to gather all the contrary to Truther version data that is out there, but those who maintain debunker sites have, and I strongly suggest contacting them. If this really is to be an open forum, I'd expect to see the debunking information put side by side with the Truther claims and compared rigorously.
I understand where Truthers are coming from, and I'm there in spirit. Many so-called debunkers were listwning to the naysayers early on. I think they're going after technical inconsistencies in the incomplete video and photographic record, with it's inevitable errors, while the bigger story, the complex US love-hate relationship with Saudi Arabia, is given short shift.
They also do not address the painful reality that tens of thousands, some estimate as many as a quarter million Americans, would have had to be complicit in keeping their foreknowledge a secret. In an era where blabbing to the press is a way to get rich quick, it's tough to swallow hundreds not coming out and cashing in on what they know, after all
these years.
Mike F
Do you have proof you are who you say you are, cashlink? You could be a CIA agent typing a disinfo script for all we know.
Prove who you are. Right here.
Originally posted by cashlink
reply to post by jthomas
Do you have proof you are who you say you are, cashlink? You could be a CIA agent typing a disinfo script for all we know.
Prove who you are. Right here.
Why don’t you stop your ridiculing rants, and answer the questions? I do not have to prove who I am, however, this topic is not about me I am the last person who would be typing disinfo, and everyone who reads my post knows that. Only you and two other in the 911 forums have done everything in your power to railroad my threads, with rants, and ridiculing.
Originally posted by jthomas
To illustrate the nature of your illogical statement, try to prove to us that the Moon exists.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by jthomas
To illustrate the nature of your illogical statement, try to prove to us that the Moon exists.
I don't know which 9/11 theory you think is as solid as the fact that the Moon is floating in the sky, but somewhere along the way you have confused what the word "theory" really means.
[edit on 3-1-2009 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by bsbray11
reply to post by jthomas
I don't think even you know what you are talking about, jthomas.
What really bugs me about your posts is how condescending they come across.
Either you are habitually too lazy to put much more than two sentences worth of thought into a post, or you honestly think it isn't even worth really trying to explain anything you believe to us because we wouldn't understand it anyway.
Now that that's off my chest, hopefully if anything else appears here that is even worth replying to, it won't come across so half-"hearted." I can only hope I guess.
Originally posted by jthomas
Let me correct you. I know exactly what I wrote and I know exactly what I was responding to.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
You need not reply to my question that was not directed to you to begin with and which you don't understand anyway.