It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by juveous
I didn't at one point ever commit to saying that a theist could not do the things an atheist does to understand right and wrong, I simply was saying theists have an understanding of universal morals, codes of conduct to fall back on when things are white, black or gray.
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
Originally posted by juveous
I didn't at one point ever commit to saying that a theist could not do the things an atheist does to understand right and wrong, I simply was saying theists have an understanding of universal morals, codes of conduct to fall back on when things are white, black or gray.
OK but then what is the difference between falling back on religious dogma and simple learned traditions?
Originally posted by juveous
lol good question, and the answer can be there is no difference at all, but are you suggesting that the learned traditions have stayed the same?
because they wouldn't be much of a tradition if they always changed, unless that of course is the tradition: constantly change.
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
Originally posted by juveous
this only is telling me the church has changed, and the traditions with it. The teachings have not changed, If anything translated. There are many beliefs out there, and some I do not agree with some I do. Religion is hard to define.
Originally posted by GrndLkNatv
The only being who could judge this topic is one that is not believed in by one of the parties and therefore this argument is null and void..
Originally posted by GrndLkNatv
And yet without a reason for a true outcome why have the discussion?
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
I totally agree. All you have to do is look up all the atheist crimes, atheist murders, atheist terrorist attacks, atheist oppressions of entire peoples, atheist genocide, atheist suicide cults, atheist sacrifices, atheist inquisitions, atheist witch trials, atheist organization mass molestation charges.
It is all right there in black and white for y'all.
Now days are fun
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
Ummmm.... no. That is from the bible. The book it is all based on to begin with. Has that religion changed what is right and wrong or not? The bible clearly states these things are wrong. It never ever clearly states they are now ok. They are not sins anymore though are they?
Originally posted by VicSage
I am often saddened by how twisted certain theist groups, mostly fundamentalist Christian, Muslim, or Jewish groups for example, can be in their ideology of hate and intolerance of others. It's even here on this forum.
Originally posted by juveous
You are concerned if the book has changed what is right or wrong, and it hasn't.
The Bible isn't clear on many things, can you imagine if it was 4000 pages long with great detail? its too bad, I think our literacy would have been better. but about the traditions, only in that specific time span 2000+ years ago was there a change in traditions, at least with this bible.
I'm not going to get into the discussion about the many other theistic beliefs out there, that have changed or not, some probably have, some probably change every 30 years, some probably have a new book with new authors every century, I'm not a theologian I don't know.
edit: now IMHO the progressive society aka "learned traditions" will always adjust what is right or wrong over time, and I think it will come down to who has the ability to persuade value, the ones that do not want to be convinced wrong - so society will adjust value for their account. It might be hard to see if that is even in a bad thing, It might be absolutely great for that society, and they might look back and say how ridiculous everyone was before....(kind of how things have changed in America regarding race) or they ask, what will things look like if this continues...and this goes back to what I mentioned before about how "facts" can create "values", and then those who make the facts will make the values - also via persuasion. I don't know, I just see things as possibly worse than better as a whole.
No. What I said was that the religion had changed what is a sin, not that the book changed anything. As far as the book, well that has changed everyt time a new king had it re-translated no?
I know why, because Christians made up their own meaning for "fulfill"
Jesus said he came to fulfill the law. Somehow Christians took that to mean that the old laws do not count anymore.
But you are the one that said the difference between traditions and religion is that traditions change and religion does not. Right?
Are Atheists Morally Superior To Theists?
Originally posted by The All Seeing I
reply to post by Ferris.Bueller.II
hmmm interesting proposition, let's see...
the ad campaign reads
YOU CAN BE GOOD WITHOUT GOD
(click to see bus ad)
For the believers (All of them, right?) to group anyone who doesn't believe in god (All of them, right?) as being bad and then deny them their right to freedom of speech, shows a somewhat similar parallel to your crude racist characterization (When the shoe fits.). Therefore in this example one could conclude that theists (All of them, right?) have a moral deficiency/blind-spot.