It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
motorists were paying nearly 120 pence a litre for petrol.
Originally posted by SectionEight
reply to post by mlmijyd
If you don't like it, grow a large square beard, move to Indiana and drive a horse and buggy. Mom and pop outfits could never fuel the economy, corporations are a necessary evil.
Originally posted by sir_chancealot
Originally posted by SectionEight
reply to post by mlmijyd
If you don't like it, grow a large square beard, move to Indiana and drive a horse and buggy. Mom and pop outfits could never fuel the economy, corporations are a necessary evil.
You are, quite probably, the most ignorant person I have ever seen on these boards. Do your research. Between 75-85% of employed people work for "mom and pop outfits".
"Mom & Pop outfits" ARE the fuel for the economy.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by NOTurTypical
brilliant....if they post a 'record profit' but their margin doesn't increase it really isn't a record profit!! What tosh. You sound just like an old boss of mine who used to say that he got the same salary increase each year as the rest of the staff. When we got a 3% increase on our $20,000 dollar salary ($600) he claimed he got the same on his $250,000 (3% of which is $7500). How many poeple think he got the same as me? The people running these companies must really think we are all idiots!
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
How would you feel if you had to spend $.91 to make $1?
"Big Oil" has a 9% profit margin..
that's paltry.
If Exxon had had the 18% net profit margin of the pharmaceuticals industry, last year's earnings would have been $66.8 billion
Originally posted by Aggie Man
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Well, take out insurance, advertising, marketing and lawsuits and I bet that pharmaceutical companies maintain less than 9% profit. Microsoft, last time I checked, was a company, not an industry, so I consider that null.
I tell you, Oil is the safest, most sure fire, most profitable business there is...wars are fought over it...no one fights a war over Microsoft or medication!
All that aside, you really think $1 for every $0.91 is paltry? you are crazy!
Profits: Exxon Mobil's first-quarter earnings of $10.9 billion, up 17% from a year earlier, are stirring outrage in Washington. Some are calling such profits "obscene." What a sad lack of understanding of economics.
Truth is, oil industry profits are in line with the rest of American industry. In 2007, a record year, they earned 8.3 cents per dollar of sales. Beverage companies and cigarette makers, by contrast, earned 19.1 cents. Drug makers, 18.4 cents. Indeed, all manufacturers, 8.9 cents on average, made more than "Big Oil."
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Who is BP?
If you are an investor in the stock market, you are BP.
If you have a 401k, hedge fund or other investment vehicle, you are BP.
If you have a pension scheme that is managed by another company, you are BP.
I am BP and the chances are, you probably are too without knowing it.
You wanna know what I did? I cut down on my driving when the petrol price was too high. I bought BP shares with the money I saved, and made a small killing on the price increase.
I was pissed at petrol prices too, but I didnt get mad... I got money.
Also how can you rant at BP considering they make at best 33-50p from a litre; the government makes the vast majority through fuel excise duty at 60-70p a litre. Yes, BP made a killing; but the government does it every day, to every company and every person.
Imperial Oil announces third quarter financial and operating results
Calgary, AB, October 30, 2008
Imperial Oil today announced that net income for the third quarter was a record $1,389 million or $1.57 a share, compared with $816 million or $0.88 a share for the same period last year. Net income for the first nine months of 2008 was $3,218 million or $3.60 a share, versus $2,302 million or $2.45 a share for the first nine months of 2007.