I don't like the sound of this "coming crisis" they're talking about. Listen.

Both Joe Biden and Colin Powell mentioned a coming crisis that will happen when Obama get elected. I don't like the sound of it. Just listen to the context of their comments, especially Colin Powell's (at around 2:35). It seems to me they know something we don't and I highly doubt their story that every new President is tested by the world, I think it's something bigger than that. Maybe something that they planned to make their jobs a lot easier.



Pay most attention to Joe Biden's comment about a "generated crisis".

I'm sure they know A LOT of things we don't know.

Are you implying that it's because of Obama being elected?

Just wondering.

reply to post by Shawn B.

Not because Obama's going to be elected. Maybe they're hoping he will be elected so that it does happen. The media really put a lot of effort into getting Obama elected. I don't know it sounded strange to me.

Probably doesn't matter much which fasocialist (my new word, you can steal it, but remember where you saw it first) win's the puppet masters sham office, but granted, an Obama win would make the fasocialist dictatorship of the western world easier to swallow for most sheeple.

But it is becoming obvious to even those with limited brains that members of both parties are aware of something actual or contrived is coming very soon.

reply to post by Shocka


I think you're quite right.

I suspect that if they are able to sham an Obama election, they will race ahead with the tyrannical global government and martial law . . . even the extermination of masses of people as quickly as they can get away with it.

If McCain manages to get elected . . . they'll take a slower route.

This is like WWII Poland lite.

The fascists on the left, the commies on the right.

Talk about your options!

Whats a little Polish man to do but wait for some foreign country to save him?

Well, on the one hand-this ain't no WWII. But on the other hand, there isn't any country on the planet that is anxious to come to our rescue. Nor would the average man on the street invite them.

But the world depends on the US for food, military aid, humanitarian aid, economic aid, and so on.

Wouldn't it be ironic if there comes a day when Iraqi troops patrol the streets of American cities??

It will certainly be an interesting election. The Democrats have Acorn with it's 400,000 illegal voter registrations. The Republicans have their hands connected to the company that owns most of the electronic voting machine.

Wouldn't it be a hoot if 100 million voters get counted 500 million times, lol?

Heck, when this election is over, the American idol voting system will look more legit.

I am also concerned about the foresight into post election America. This better not have anything to do with seizing guns.

I know a handful of police officers and a handful of military; they have told me (I asked) they would have a serious conflict in collecting guns from law abiding citizens.

Folks, i don't care what political party you belong to. We need to put the US Constitution first and our political preferences need to be a distant second.

Are we going to organize and prepare for what MIGHT be coming or are we just going to give up this democratic capitalist republic without so much as a large protest?

USA
RIP
1776-2009

Here is the situation, we can no longer afford to have our troops in the middle east but we can not afford not to either.

Blue pill, red pill. We have reached a point where it doesn't matter which pill you take.

Any thoughts?

How the hell do you specify a time for a “crisis” within a two day period and not know what the “crisis” is?
That’s rather condescending if you ask me.
Moreover something really stinks when Biden states “ Because it's not going to be apparent initially, it's not going to be apparent that we're right." Referring to the alleged deeply unpopular decisions that Obama will have to make.
That means in Human speak, it will be wrong and you are going to have to bend over grab your ankles and enjoy.

reply to post by snowen20


Good point. And Obama will be elected because haven't you had the feeling that McCain is like throwing the election purposely? He's made some pretty hugely stupid decisions..

reply to post by Shocka


Or it could be a what-you-see-is-what-you-get. I don't believe for a second that McCain is throwing the election. He has an uphill battle and he's frustrated. No matter how hard he tries to distance himself from Bush and the current catastrophe it appears the people aren't being fooled.

A wiser man than me once said, 'You don't need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows'.

And before the trolls jump in here, he meant weatherman as in meteorologist -- not Ayers.


[edit on 27-10-2008 by jtma508]

I've heard this mentioned many times, but we need to bear in mind our psychology 101 rules here, and this is what this is.

These off the cuff remarks are meant to incite nationalism much like the alleged "unification" across party lines during the 9-11 debacle.

Problem: "There will be a test of our new Presidency"
Reaction: "We must rally with he whom we believe is the most ideally suited to deal with said problem"
Solution: "Vote for the above."


These guys aren't speaking of impending doom, more specifically they're speaking of ALL impending doom. More than likely they want you to believe they're in the know of such events. If they garner enough people who actually fit the bill (ie., people who actually buy into the fact that they believe they DO know something), then psychology would suggest that they also would most likely vote for them because if they CAN know then they CAN be proactive. In a world where preemption is becoming the norm for almost everything, subliminally one must ascribe to who can possibly stave off destruction by employing it.

AB1

reply to post by Shocka

The media really put a lot of effort into getting Obama elected.

Shocka, truer words have never been written! I agree wholeheartedly with the OP on this. I don't like the sound of it either, especially after having spent this whole year reading ATS, and listening to Alex Jones and Coast to Coast AM. I've become a conspiracy theory nut these days and these videos raise my hackels quite a bit. (take a look at my signature)

As far as Obama, the question becomes who wants him in power so desperately? Is it the media heads themselves or is someone jerking their chain? My gut instinct tells me not to go along with anything the media forces on the public. They pulled this 8 years ago and we got Bush. I do not trust the media at all and firmly believe they have hurt Obama with all their rah-rah-ing. All the adults I know are absolutely sick to death of Obama and this election. If he wins I will believe the election was stolen or won by sheer brainwashing.

I think it is pretty bizarre that these statements are being made,seems to me that something is up,and yes seems like Mc Cain is acting somewhat lethargic on his campaign,maybe the media is all for socialism,that statement that Obama will tell people do do something that doesn't seem right? that can't be a good thing

Originally posted by Shocka
reply to post by snowen20

 

Good point. And Obama will be elected because haven't you had the feeling that McCain is like throwing the election purposely? He's made some pretty hugely stupid decisions..

Exactly and why is this so obvious and why don't the Republicans stand up and lay blame where blame is due?
Screaming about how scared they are of Obama doesnt/isnt succesful, why not go for the real culprit of this campaign?
I guarantee you Obama would not have had such a great chance without the help of McCain and why?
Why, why, why?

I think they know exactly what's going to happen. It sounds like it comes from within the U.S.A. I am not much of a politician, but I do sense that America is on the brink of civil war. They use analytical methods to predict certain outcomes and I think this could be it. Would like to hear from others.

Think about it. How could 'the media' possibly be for socialism? They are wholly owned by some of the biggest corporate interests and eleite families in the country. 'Socialism' runs counter to everything for which they stand. If anything, they should be supporting the status quo: pro-corperatism and wealth shifting toward the elite. Personally, I think any apparent bias towards Obama is simply them being the whores they are and playing to the popular opinion.

Originally posted by Seeker Mom
reply to post by Shocka

 

The media really put a lot of effort into getting Obama elected.

Shocka, truer words have never been written!

As far as Obama, the question becomes who wants him in power so desperately?

The McCain campaign/GOP has put just as much effort into getting Obama elected as the media.
Never forget that.
Yes who does want in him in power?
The Dems, The GOP, The Media, American Citizens but what about the real powers? The Military Industrial Complex??? Big Oil????
How would an Obama election help those guys?
Legitimate concerning questions need and should be asked but we are all caught up in the bickering talking points that have been laid out for us.

Capitalism for the ones on top and socialism for the ones far far below. This is how they'd like it. I think thats called Dictatorship.

reply to post by Benarius


Really????????
Because as of the bailout bill we have SOCIALISM for the wealthy and CAPITALISM for everyone else.
Why cant hardcore conservative republicans see this???
And why dont they get pissed as hell about it????

this was a reply to jtm508

also this post doesnt reply. Whats wrong with my reply button???

Reply to SEEWHATUDO

What is so socialistic about the bailout? It doesn't even spread below the top 1% who lay their hands on.