This topic is in the Military & Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


MJ-12




Topic started on 7-7-2002 @ 05:58 PM by Icarus


Anyone have any pics of the MJ-12 or anything pertaining to them? Besides the leaked MJ-12 manual.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-7-2002 @ 03:06 PM by LOBO


I have come across a document relating to MJ-12...it reads as follows:

TOP SECRET
EYES ONLY
THE WHITE HOUSE
washington

September 24, 1947.

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

Dear Secretary Forrestal:
As per our recent conversation on this matter, you are hereby authorized to proceed with all due speed and caution upon your undertaking. Hereafter this matter shall be reerred to only as Operation Majestic Twelve.

It continues to be my feeling that any future considerations relative to the ultimate disposition of this matter should rest solely with the Office of the President following appropriate discussions with yourself, Dr. Bush and the Director of Central Intelligence.

Harry Truman


TOP SECRET
EYES ONLY

As for the authenticity of this document, I cannot verify that it is truly authentic. However, if it is, it may be more truth that the MJ-12 exists.
NOTE: The date the document was written is the same year that the Roswell Incident occured...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-8-2002 @ 02:40 PM by Hagbard.Celine


the president usually doesnt get clued in to such stuff, and the white house is hardly a secure place for memos.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-9-2002 @ 09:07 PM by filandd


Back then the it was because nobody expected anything like that.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-9-2002 @ 04:47 PM by necro99


uuummmm... did you see the communication system in the 1950's?
they where rolling carpets that you put your papers on it, it may be VERY EASY to steal a document tha way...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-9-2002 @ 07:34 PM by joebrown


It is very naive to think that government secrets would be leaked out in documents. Do you evn think they would put it onto paper if it was top secret. Anybody can create a document and label it government top secret, that means nothing. Even if such a document was found in gov. archieves, that only means that the government has looked at a copy of it. If a falsified top secret document was floating around I would expect the government to obtain a copy of it for investigation. It is only logical.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2003 @ 01:02 PM by planetlegend



Originally posted by joebrown
It is very naive to think that government secrets would be leaked out in documents. Do you evn think they would put it onto paper if it was top secret. Anybody can create a document and label it government top secret, that means nothing. Even if such a document was found in gov. archieves, that only means that the government has looked at a copy of it. If a falsified top secret document was floating around I would expect the government to obtain a copy of it for investigation. It is only logical.



Everything that happens must be written down because they must have a record of everything that happens. Also why would they have false documents for. It just does not make sense. And yes the original documents were stolen. The reason I know this is because I know someone who had the original documents. but thats to bad i cannot tell u who it is. You may believe me or not but the MJ-12 papers are real. They are not a false copy.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-8-2003 @ 01:05 PM by Gazrok


and you'll find what you're looking for...

www.majesticdocuments.com...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-8-2003 @ 04:42 PM by Hagbard.Celine


Everything that happens must be written down because they must have a record of everything that happens. Also why would they have false documents for. It just does not make sense.


fool. bring a lighter to your head to rid youself of the wool pulled so easily over it. everything to relieve suspiscion is written down, and that which would cause unease is edited or censored to be stable and not cause a compromise



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 08:22 AM by moondust11


did anybody notice that REX 84 and MAJESTIC 12 mean the same thing if you look deeper in the words?

let me explain:

REX means KING in latin; a king is majestic...
and 84? okay: 8 + 4 = 12

see????


any explanations?



   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.015 seconds
Page processed in 0.098 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread