Data-Mining for Terrorists Not 'Feasible,' DHS-Funded Study Finds, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 10-10-2008 @ 04:36 PM by Keyhole

Data-Mining for Terrorists Not 'Feasible,' DHS-Funded Study Finds


blog.wired.com
The government should not be building predictive data-mining programs systems that attempt to figure out who among millions is a terrorist, a privacy and terrorism commission funded by Homeland Security reported Tuesday. The commission found that the technology would not work and the inevitable mistakes would be un-American.

The committee, created by the National Research Council in 2005, also expressed doubts about the effectiveness of technology designed to decide from afar whether a person had terrorist intents, saying false positives could quickly lead to privacy invasions.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www8.nationalacademies.org
newsinfo.iu.edu
arstechnica.com
www.aclu.org


reply posted on 10-10-2008 @ 04:42 PM by Keyhole
Here's another quote from the ACLU.

ACLU Hails DHS-Funded Report Condemning Data Mining
The report validates ACLU fears that the practice of data mining is not only vastly invasive to Americans’ privacy but is also ineffective.

“Data mining as preventative law enforcement is alchemy at its worst,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “Given the administration’s steady creep towards a total surveillance society, this report could not be more relevant. It is a scathing rebuke of the Bush administration’s policy of vast and indiscriminate information gathering. A major pillar of the administration's post-9/11 policy has proven itself, as we said it would, to be wholly unstable. The systematic and broad-scale surveillance of Americans is doing nothing to keep us safe. With data mining, it is clearer than ever that the risk far outweighs the reward.”




“This report validates the ACLU's longstanding claim that data mining for anti-terror and law enforcement work is worse than junk science, it is pseudo-science,” said Timothy D. Sparapani, ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel. “Government agencies that are spending billions on data mining to fight terror would spend their money more effectively trying to discover a magical formula to turn lead into gold. The bloated watch lists are a special case in point. Applying data mining techniques like ‘link analysis’ to the million-person watch list casts a stain of suspicion on everyone who encounters someone on that list – and will quickly balloon it to a hundred million-person watch list. If not stopped now, data mining will turn us all into suspects.”



Maybe sometime in the not so distant future we just may see the government come to their senses and stop this unnecessary surveillance and data gathering on its own citizens!



reply posted on 10-10-2008 @ 04:50 PM by Maxmars
Your presentation of this information was excellent.

Analysis: data mining doesn't work for spotting terrorists

Don't want them to close this thread so I am going to ask to have mine closed and redirected here...

Great job!

No one read my post anyway

[edit on 10-10-2008 by Maxmars]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags