It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Manawydan
Originally posted by grimreaper797
reply to post by lynn112
People not having credit isnt what we are worried about, its companies not getting credit. If this happens over a long enough period, they will shrink considerably, meaning unemployment will rise considerably.
A silly question on my side no doubt, but I honestly don't know better than to ask. Would you say that companies that relay so heavily on credit to business should contract, seeing that they've over-expanded to the point that their income no longer supports their size?
I mean how much credit can they expect to keep getting?
Or am I complete wrong on this?
Kind regards.
Originally posted by The Axeman
And it would have without the godforsaken bailout, too!
Originally posted by grimreaper797
The bailout will get rid of those bad assets.
Without a bailout, what would causes the banks to resume lending before, say the 2nd quater of 2009?
Originally posted by lynn112
The bailout is not getting rid of the bad assets, it's just transfering them to the backs of the American people. Tell me how exactly it will help when the consumers have no more buying power, when we can no longer afford to buy from these companies that we have bailed out? I'll tell you what will happen, they'll fold, file bankruptcy & we'll be burdened with even more bad debts.
Originally posted by The Axeman
Maybe they wouldn't. Maybe it would hurt. Certainly it would. There would be problems.