It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by americandingbat
Originally posted by titorite
Now your not lying yet but if we continue this conversation eventually we are gonna get around to the method of being able to prove the point.
Because I disagree with you (which you don't even know; I just said it couldn't be replicated), you accuse me of lying and disinformation.
-adb
Originally posted by SimonGray
1). Posting: You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered form this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.
Originally posted by titorite
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
as you claim this ` skeptic lies ` are rampant - care to cite some ? just so we know you are not lying
UM I can! in this thread I post back to a person that insists I am dodging people addressing me. I explain to the fellow as tactfully as I can that just because my screen name shares a pronoun to describe those that believe the Titor story does not mean some one is addressing me.... Especially when the quote in question is:
" the Titorite's have been saying for years that there might be a woman President in 2009.... and so on"
Surely even those of limited I.Q.s are able to tell that the quote above does not address me.....anyways this is just one example of lying instigators.
Alex jones, 911, pick your topic and I can pick out the pseudo-skeptic that insists your facts are false despite verifiable Mainstream links!
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by titorite
So a scarlet H then?
I
Originally posted by ROO-meh
It's a money making cia snoop shop ..why do you take it so seriously this ats was bought out years ago stop crying and find an honest source ...
Oh wait chair shuffle ... bring it on ...
Originally posted by americandingbat
...you have no problem admitting that Titor was wrong about many predictions, but feel he was of service anyway.
-adb
Originally posted by Majic
...But if another member asserts his story can't be true because the CIA doesn't spy on American citizens, he's not necessarily lying (though definitely wrong) because it is supposedly illegal for the CIA to spy on Americans in the U.S.
...
Originally posted by Majic
Bonfire Of The Mendacities
Our very first term/condition:
Originally posted by SimonGray
1). Posting: You will not post any material that is knowingly false, misleading, or inaccurate. You will not solicit personal information from any member. You will not use information gathered form this website to harass, abuse or harm other people.
The key word in the first sentence is knowingly. Being wrong, mistaken or skeptical is not against the rules, only deliberate deception.
Proving intent can be difficult, and when there is any doubt, it must go to the member. There are cases where intent can be proven, however.
Originally posted by sir_chancealotA
nd this right here is a prime example. Without debating this point, Titor wasn't wrong about "many predictions". All the "he was a hoaxer" people point to the same two predictions he got wrong. How does two constitute a "many"?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by ROO-meh
It's a money making cia snoop shop ..why do you take it so seriously this ats was bought out years ago stop crying and find an honest source ...
A fine example of a lie.
What shall be the penalty?
Originally posted by ravenflt
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by ROO-meh
It's a money making cia snoop shop ..why do you take it so seriously this ats was bought out years ago stop crying and find an honest source ...
A fine example of a lie.
What shall be the penalty?
Change his avatar to a pic of Bush for a month....
(i mean George Bush just incase you were wondering lol).
Originally posted by Mr. Secret
There should be a button to "stone" liars to death..
Another 18 seconds and I got this article from 1999 explaining the potential for micro singularities being created at CERN.
www.iop.org...
This is almost too easy.
Abstract. This paper considers the evolution of the relation between gravitational theory and cosmology from the development of the first simple quantitative cosmological models in 1917 to the sophistication of our cosmological models at the turn of the millenium. It is structured around a series of major ideas that have been fundamental in developing today's models, namely: 1, the idea of a cosmological model; 2, the idea of an evolving universe; 3, the idea of astronomical observational tests; 4, the idea of physical structure development; 5, the idea of causal and visual horizons; 6, the idea of an explanation of spacetime geometry; and 7, the idea of a beginning to the universe. A final section considers relating our simplified models to the real universe, and a series of related unresolved issues that need investigation.