Originally posted by DeadFlagBlues
I wonder what the implications would be to have only state banks. Balancing gold, silver, and other hard assets around from state to state, creating a
bunch of national competing monies. If you had states balancing their checkbook every month, and exchanging hard money as it stands, there would need
to be any adjusting currency rates and printing off ghost bills.
Not really...The Constitution
(& therefore, We the People who ordained & established the
Constitution) gave to Congress
the Power to "To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights
and Measures;" (Article1, Section 8, Clause 5) & to "To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United
States" (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 6). Therefore, the States don't need to figure relative exchange rates...Congress would merely need to "fix
the Standard," uniform among all States.
Also, since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is in violation of the law
by giving over a Power of Congress to a foreign controlled,
cartel of bankers, that means that Congress itself violated its own duty to the Constitution (& the People!)...Since Congress has
not been given any Powers to violate
the law, even by legislation, then the Federal Reserve Act itself was not valid in the first place. The
only way it could have possibly been made valid would be as an actual Amendment to the Constitution, but no office or branch of the government is
allowed to act in direct opposition to the Constitution itself either.
Since the Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933, the government has also further violated
the Constitution by allowing the Federal Reserve Bank
to achieve a total monopoly
on the use of Federal Reserve Notes as currency...In which case, Congress gave up on the "Punishment of
counterfeiting" & also violated Article 1, Section 10 Clause 1 by forcing the States to adopt the use of FRN's
! After all, that particular
Clause includes specifically, "No State shall...make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;"
So if the Federal Reserve Bank is, by strict definition of the Law, nothing less that an illegal counterfeiting, loan-sharking organization, then is
any debt owed to the Fed Res even a legal debt? If the Federal Reserve Act & the Emergency Banking Relief Act were never legally valid
legislation in the first place, doesn't that mean that the whole of the federal deficit is invalid? Even by the Uniform Commercial Code, under the
sections on Remedy & Recourse (UCC 1-203 & UCC 1-207), doesn't that mean that the whole of the Federal Reserve Board should be arrested & tried?
Doesn't that also mean that they must also provide just recompense for all of the wealth they've literally stolen/conned
from the People &
No, I don't believe that repealing
the consequences of those two illegal Acts is a matter of question: The act of Repealing something means
that it must have been valid to begin with, which is not
the case here...Even the UCC says that any contract entered under fraudulent terms is
automatically voided right back to the moment of inception...Which means that such "contracts" were never valid
. I'd say it's less a matter
of throwing more legislation around than it is more of a matter of enforcing
the Law (including
JFK's EO 1110) & bringing the
lawbreakers to Justice, followed by restoration of asset-backed (gold/silver) currency instead of continuing to allow a nation-wide (& world-wide!)
Originally posted by Equinox99
The bill will most likely be killed off. If it does pass then the people will owe the government money, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was with
Actually, the reverse is true...The Government owes the People lots of money. Everything they've ever borrowed from those criminal banksters was
based upon the credit standing of the People
! Our "taxes" go directly for making payments on the mere interest
charged on the deficit!
The federal deficit is not what the People owe to the government...It's what the government owes to the People! It's way past
time for some
serious payback, I think...
There's no one from the generation (during the timeframe of 1913 to 1933, when the Fed Res was illegally established until they engineered the first
Great Depression) alive today to teach us "newbies" how it happened. That's why it's happening again
...They think that we've "forgotten"
our own history. Even though the wide-spread cry of "Never Again" was declared after Hitler's Holocaust, we can see in our own very recent history
how it is
happening again...America is on the verge of repeating the history of Hitler & it takes blindness, through ignorance or denial, to
fail seeing it.
Originally posted by TheRedneck
It is technically illegal to not accept Federal Reserve Notes as payment within the United States of America.
Well, that's true, but part of my point earlier is that Congress (nor any other part of the government, or the government in whole) ever had the
to pass that legislation at all...The legislation itself is voided by Law, because the legislation itself was based upon a
fraud. That's why I've referred to FRN's as being counterfeits
of money. I think a more accurate (& oft-used) term (well, oft-used by me,
anyway) for FRN's would be "corporate scrip" because it's issued by a corporation...And therefore, automatically illegal by Constitutional
for use as "legal tender."
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
The FRB now is the legal owner of that one oz of gold and may choose to remove it from deep storage if they wish. The big question is have they taken
that position ?
They did...With the Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933: I really don't have any factual evidence to determine whether or not the Treasury actually
has anything in reserve today
...They may have gotten something
by now, but I don't think so because (for example) the Social Security
Fund has nothing but Congressional IOU's in it.
The Treasury didn't have enough gold assets to completely cover the federal deficit at the time & that's why all of the current
backed by the credit of the People
now. It works, in a nutshell, like this: When a new infant is born, somebody on the hospital staff shoves a
bunch of paperwork at the parents, saying that they "have to fill this out." Some of that paperwork is for the registration
of a live
birth...Had the parents simply recorded & filed
the live birth with the Hall of Records (in the County of birth), then that bypasses the
process (all done legally...The registration itself is a form of "contract" with the government).
the Birth Certificate passes through the Department of Health & Vital Statistics to complete the registration with the federal
government, then gets bundled with others & gets shipped to the Bureau of Commerce
! From there, that's how the government "justifies" making
the general public "obligated" to the federal deficit. This is also what gives those "child protection agencies" any kind of "semi-legal"
authority to whisk away our children if they have any reason whatsoever...There have been some cases where, children taken away at first have been
returned to the parents
, simply because the child was recorded & filed
instead of registered
However, the whole registration process violates several UCC clauses, as well as the Constitution's clauses against "indentured servitude!" Are the
parents provided with Full Disclosure of all terms & conditions? Is it duly represented by legal counsel when presented to the parents, instead of
uninformed hospital staff that cannot properly present such "contracts?" Doesn't this constitute Constructive Fraud!!??
The Kick Them All Out Project
Originally posted by FiatLux
As for my rep., I think his days of representing this district is about over. And many people out there should do the same, get rid of the whole
bunch, and start new.