It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The Bush administration's proposal to bail out some of Wall Street's biggest players with an unprecedented transfer of public wealth to the private sector sent shock-waves throughout the nation.
Already deep in deficit, the administration wants to borrow $700 billion dollars -- in addition to the $900 billion already spent this year to prop up troubled lending institutions and deal with the fall-out from the housing crisis -- and entrust it to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, fresh from a long run on Wall Street himself. He'd then buy up worthless paper from struggling banks.
Who would get the money? Nobody knows. Paulson says he wants to hire Wall Street firms to oversee the process.
Under Bush's plan, the taxpayer would get little, if anything, in return. The whole thing would happen without Congressional oversight, save for a semi-annual report on the process, and Paulson's actions would be beyond challenge in the courts.
It is an economic coup d'etat in the making. And people are talking about little else. Here's 10 things that have been on our radars ...
Originally posted by grover
No company, no corporation, no instituition, no investment house, no bank, no insurance company should ever be allowed to get so large that their failure alone would adversely effect the economy.
Originally posted by nyk537
As I've said in other threads, if nothing else, perhaps we can get Chris Dodd and Barney Frank to resign. Both of my fingers are pointed straight at those two for the majority of this mess. They should have nothing to do with this new bailout.
Originally posted by grover
The Republicans and specifically the anti-tax anti-regulation crowd within the Republican party are the ones most responsible for this mess. They are after all the ones starting back in the 80's with Reagan pushed the whole notion that we were hampering Wall street with regulations.
The thing is those regulations were put into place for good reason... to reign in the excess and corrpution that led to the great depression... and nothing has changed.
But the fact is, President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.
Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."
Bush tried to act. Who stopped him? Congress, especially Democrats with their deep financial and patronage ties to the two government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie.
Originally posted by nyk537
As I've said, Bush tried to stop this in 2003.
Don't believe me?
But the fact is, President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.
Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."
Bush tried to act. Who stopped him? Congress, especially Democrats with their deep financial and patronage ties to the two government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie and Freddie.
Full Article
This is where it all began.
[edit on 23-9-2008 by nyk537]
Originally posted by nyk537
As I've said, Bush tried to stop this in 2003.
Don't believe me?
But the fact is, President Bush in 2003 tried desperately to stop Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from metastasizing into the problem they have since become.
Here's the lead of a New York Times story on Sept. 11, 2003: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago."
Question, which party was in control of congress in 2003?
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by yellowcard
I don't watch either... I don't have cable... I just know my history... and I also know that there are plenty of Democratic collaborators to blame as well but the imputus came from the hard right of the republican party and no one else but.