posted on Sep, 22 2008 @ 06:29 AM
Originally posted by JaxonRobertsThere is no indication that Palin was using the Yahoo account for 'Official Business'
She was reprimanded (sp?) for it by her people
many times about doing it.
Edited to add:
I also have a feeling this wasn't anonymous... Why? Because I think they would have beefed up security on the site after the night anon
attempted to hack/crack both Foxnews and Billoreilly.com and they didn't have enough people to do so... Unless of course due to that, they
felt anon weren't a threat?
Also for those people saying what anon/any other group are doing in hacking Palin's email and billoreilly.com is immoral, illegal etc etc. - As some
other people stated; so is tapping our phonelines, reading our personal emails and checking our bank records without warrents or permission, but
everyone seems to forget that, when it happens.
Yes, I agree that when cracking O'Reilly's site, posting the usernames/passwords of seemingly innocent people (supporters of Bill or not) is just as
bad as the Gov't poking their noses into those peoples private affairs and they could have done something different (I liked the Obama 08 banners all
over the site idea lol) - But if the Gov't can dish out but not take back they shouldn't be doing it in the first place.
It's like "Whhaaaa! We're all big and powerful so we're allowed to do it to you sheeple! You fighting back and giving us a taste of our own
medicine is NOT ALLOWED! STOP IT! STOP FIGHTING BACK!"
It's ridiculous.
[edit on 22-9-2008 by A55A551N]