It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DHS is all-hazards, and these children are going to be taught about how to not talk to strangers, to prepare 72-hour provision kits, to plan fire escape plans, tornado/earthquake/hurricane plans, and how to dial "0" or "911".
Homeland Security being a right-wing conspiracy? I have co-authored graduate level curricula for Homeland Security, and I am sorry to inform all you conspiracy theorists that it is not well enough funded or organized to be a threat (not yet anyway).
Most of the people involved with DHS are either ex-military or they push for local control and limiting government
The damage done in the public school systems to our children are orders of magnitude worse than DHS working with Sesame Street. Children are across the board indoctrinated into liberal worldviews and garbage that is much more of a threat to our rights than DHS ever has been. Are you people really zealots to the point that you cannot even open your eyes and think?
Say cookie monster? What's up with radiation poisoning?
"Hi Kids (as he puts on his smelly sweater, which he has worn through 2,000 episodes)
" Today we're going to discuss something new -nuclear war.
Can you say NU-CU-LAR WAR? I THOUGHT YOU COULD."
"Let's look at Mr. Roger's Neighborhood"
As the camera pans to his toy-mock up of houses and streets, an explosion rips the houses apart, and his neighborhood lies in ruins.
"See kids, that's what NU-CU-LAR WAR does to my neighborhood. "
"But it could just as easily be YOUR neighborhood"
Have a nice day, kiddies, and sleep well.
And don't forget to tell your daddy and mommy to build that NU_CU_LAR WAR shelter in your back yard."
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
You may have co-authored graduate-level courses(Is that supposed to impress us?-big deal, I taught them), but I will tell you, you CANNOT talk to a 3 or 4 year old like you can to a grad student!
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
So you are saying the DHS is incompetent to handle their tasks? ALL THE MORE REASON not to let them handle this one.
So stupid comments like "turn in your parents if they are Democrats" is so far off-based that they are infantile.
Maybe so however if you had been in Germany during the 1930's, you might not have been so sure of your statement.
Can it happen here? Yes, if we don't guard against it.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
Remember, Hitler didn't go full-blown at the start... Guess what, the press in Germany was in love with him, just like the love affair of the MSM today with you-know-who.
If you had been around, you could have participated in my thread about Homeschooling, and how the CA Supreme Court OUTLAWED it in CA.
I certainly don't think it is a "right-wing" conspiracy. What I do think, though, is that together with the Patriot Act, there is too much room for potential abuse... The quicker that ACT is thrown out, the better.
By the way, if you don't like to discuss conspiracies, then perhaps ATS is not for you:
Originally posted by TheRedneck
According to www.census.gov... , The budget for the Department of Homeland Security in 2007 was $26,878,200,000, almost 27 billion dollars.
Ramos and Compean, for instance, are only two of dozens of Border Patrol and border area police officers who have been prosecuted and/or claim to have been threatened as a result of nothing more than doing their job.
Most of the people involved with DHS are either ex-military or they push for local control and limiting government
Limiting government? Surely you jest... read the Patriot Act... it has nothing to do with limiting government, and everything to do with expanding the powers of the government, in many cases well beyond the scope granted to it in the US Constitution.
A good chunk of this money was already allocated before the department was formed. In fact, that was a large criticism of the Bush administration, that DHS was formed, then almost no money was allocated to make it go. Initially it was only reorganizational.
Another very important factor is that FEMA is under DHS, as is the Coast Guard. The 2007 numbers reflect that these agencies have blank checks for hurricane relief which is still being spent for Katrina. And this year, it will reflect Ike. So, it is not cut-and-dry.
I am not an expert on that case. My initial response is two-fold: my heart goes out to those guys and they should get a pardon. On the flip-side, nobody is above the law. Isn't that the argument here?
Most of the people involved with DHS are either ex-military or they push for local control and limiting government
I do not like the PATRIOT Act, and I think it is a travesty. But Abortion is more of a travesty. The PATRIOT Act has precedent in American history, and worse things have been tolerated, such as the so-called "Civil War" where States' rights were trampled by a bunch of liberals. So, I am cynical about such matters, to say the least.
Islamic terrorist's? Are you sure! Look toward your own Government and Israel me thinks.
Originally posted by watch_the_rocks
Considering Islamic terrorism has killed 3, 000 people on U.S. soil, compared to, say, the 42,116 that were killed in highway crashes alone in that same year or the 20, 000 that annually die from the flu, I think there are potentially more pressing issues they could be educating our children about.
Islamic terrorist's? Are you sure! Look toward your own Government and Israel me thinks.
It was "one of the classic all-American cover-ups," said retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.
My point was that most of the people involved in the Homeland Security departments in this great nation are largely in one of the two camps. But there are enough conservatives, who support local control and love freedom, to be whistle blowers.
Yes, in a way, I am saying that. But I think that they can handle Sesame Street. It is not rocket science, or even "government work" for that matter
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
My point was that most of the people involved in the Homeland Security departments in this great nation are largely in one of the two camps. But there are enough conservatives, who support local control and love freedom, to be whistle blowers.
One of the problems that I see is that the DHS structure is in place. Let us assume that you are correct, and that there are enough conservatives to prevent the abuses so many of us are concerned with. Now let's imagine that Obama becomes President. The first thing a new Administration does is clean house, as you know. So now, all of the conservatives are out, and all of a sudden, the liberals that have been complaining about DHS, see it as a way of advancing their cause, and now you have liberals in DHS doing exactly what many of us are afraid of. Just as in war, a weapon in our hands, becomes a weapon of the enemy, once captured.
Originally posted by TheRedneckI knew this was going to come up. Yes, you can turn off the TV, but are you seriously advocating that parents who disagree with this move should sequester themselves from all communication with society?
Sesame Street has traditionally been a staple of children's programming that taught counting, the alphabet, etc. I know parents who used it (besides myself) to help teach their children while entertaining them at the same time and allowing the parents to do chores. Not everyone has a maid to clean and a chef in their home to cook.
Not to mention that a lot of parents are not reading this board. If I had children at the Sesame Street age, I would probably curtail their viewing of the show, unless I was watching as well. But that's because I saw this article. How many parents didn't?
So I am implicitly allowing the government to raise my children if I send them to school? Check the law books; that is a legal requirement, not a personal choice (unless you have the time and knowledge to home-school).
I think your arguments in this case are unreasonable, based on the present laws and realistic demands of living in society.
Huh? Who said anything about being cut off from all communication w/ society? Drama much?? (not trying to be rude, but this is what is frustrating to me... ppl blowing things out of proportion. you have specifically done so with my words)
Their family, their business. Just because you don't like, it doesn't give you the right to worry about and impose on how ppl are choosing to raise their kids, regardless of if they have a maid and/or chef (not sure why this would be thrown in other than maybe the bitter bug has bitten you).
I think my view is very reasonable. You don't think so because it doesn't agree with yours.
Their family, their business. Just because you don't like, it doesn't give you the right to worry about and impose on how ppl are choosing to raise their kids, regardless of if they have a maid and/or chef (not sure why this would be thrown in other than maybe the bitter bug has bitten you).
but ultimately, it is up to us to decide in OUR OWN lives what is and isn't acceptable.
Originally posted by TheRedneckThen you are either reading my posts without any comprehension of what I am saying, reading them with some deep-set belief that this is all fantasy, or not reading them at all. Your reply was composed of nothing more than complaints about how I have exposed the fallacies in your argument.