It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance permission from The Above Network, LLC). You will not post-by-proxy the material of banned members or other individuals who are not members, but have written a response to content within a thread on these forums.
1d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance permission from The Above Network, LLC). You will not post-by-proxy the material of banned members or other individuals who are not members, but have written a response to content within a thread on these forums.
Originally posted by johndoex
If not, feel free to browse our forum in the AA77 pinned topics section, you're specifically looking for "Debunking FDR Debunking" claim 2.
Originally posted by johndoex
Please review the DME video in the thread mentioned.
Bottom line, Farmer is using what is called "ReadOut2" as the foundation for most of his analysis (as do many of the anonymous 'experts' seen here). However, he never decoded "ReadOut2", we did. We also put this statement as a disclaimer regarding RO2 when we had it decoded.
Originally posted by exponent
I have done so (I believe), it was hardly convincing as no error analysis was performed.
It is my understanding he is using several radar hits along with the FDR readout to match up timelines.
I find it strange that you seem to think that the NTSB is infallible except when they get things entirely wrong.
Still I plan to conduct my own analysis of the data available.
and the FDR CSV
plus the RADES data.
I am no expert,
but I do have quite a lot of experience with large data set analysis
edit: I should note that I asked another question I would appreciate you answering
1d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance permission from The Above Network, LLC). You will not post-by-proxy the material of banned members or other individuals who are not members, but have written a response to content within a thread on these forums.
iii) You will not post, use the chat feature or use the private message system to solicit members of The Above Network, LLC on behalf of another message board, online community or competitor. You will not attempt to use your membership to encourage or lure other members in any way to other websites or discussion boards in competition with The Above Network, LLC.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Now, having said all of that, let's turn to this alleged 'G-force' calculations aspect. The Flight Recorder of AAL77 DOES record G-forces. So, why are they to be ignored??
Someone would have to be able to completely 'fake' the Recorder data....all of it, that fits together perfectly, and all done in binary code???
Anyone know how that could have been accomplished?
Originally posted by johndoex
Hi again exponent,
Please review the DME video in the thread mentioned.
Mr Farmer used to consult with us since he isnt a pilot. Once we tried to explain things to him that he didnt want to hear (namely DME), he became very arrogant and started attacks.
Bottom line, Farmer is using what is called "ReadOut2" as the foundation for most of his analysis (as do many of the anonymous 'experts' seen here). However, he never decoded "ReadOut2", we did. We also put this statement as a disclaimer regarding RO2 when we had it decoded.
...
All our analysis is based on NTSB provided parameters and data, decoded by the experts at the NTSB, with the proper software to decode such data. It doesnt support the govt story. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment. The anonymous "experts" here claim the data provided and prepared by the NTSB is littered with errors. Yet they refuse to contact the NTSB regarding such errors. The difference between Farmer and the anonymous "experts" here, is that Farmer did contact the NTSB regarding "missing seconds". I think he filed suit. I personally think that is a great idea because he will soon find out why the NTSB doesnt claim their provided data isnt missing any seconds as he didnt want to hear what we had to say...
Hope this helps...
Again, anyone with questions, please email us and/or visit our forums. We usually reply rather quickly.
Regards,
Rob
Originally posted by beachnut
We have the INS accurate to 1500 to 3000 feet.
Originally posted by Reheat
Since the INS was 2000'-4000' in error...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The DME accuracy for Flight 77, 0.23 NM
backed by AIM and studies done.
Originally posted by beachnut
The RO2 positions are good,