It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Teach 'the pleasure of gay sex' to children as young as five, say researchers.

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 06:53 PM
link   
Children as young as five should be taught to understand the pleasures of gay sex, according to leaders of a taxpayer-funded education project.

Heads of the project have set themselves a goal of 'creating primary classrooms where queer sexualities are affirmed and celebrated'.

The ambition was revealed in documents prepared for the No Outsiders project run by researchers from universities and backed with £600,000 of public money provided by the Economic and Social Research Council.

The stated purpose of the project - which is operating in 14 primary schools - is to stop bullying and prejudice aimed at homosexuals.

However, at a seminar at Exeter University tomorrow, supporters of the group will go beyond the anti-bullying agenda and discuss 'pleasure and desire in educational contexts'.

A document prepared for the seminar and couched in convoluted academic jargon says: 'The team is concerned to interrogate the desexualisation of children's bodies, the negation of pleasure and desire in educational contexts, and the tendency to shy away from discussion of (sexual) bodily activity in No Outsiders project work.

'The danger of accusations of the corruption of innocent children has led team members to make repeated claims that this project is not about sex or desire - and that it is therefore not about bodies.

'Yet, at a very significant level, that is exactly what it is about and to deny this may have significant negative implications for children and young people.'

No Outsiders is led by researchers from Sunderland University and also involves academics at the Institute of Education and Exeter University. Books, puppet shows and plays are used to teach children about same-sex relationships.

During the project, the seminar paper says, its members have 'challenged each other to go beyond imagined possibilities into queer practice'.

The seminar will 'question the taken-for-granted of the supposedly sexless, bodiless and desire-less primary classroom' and examine 'the place of the research team members' own bodies, desires and pleasures in this research'.

The discussions provoked a furious reaction from critics of the homosexual rights agenda. Simon Calvert of the Christian Institute said: 'When an adult who is working in a primary school suggests that children should explore their sexuality, that should result in a complaint to the police.'

Patricia Morgan, author of studies of family life and gay adoption, said: 'The proposal is that primary school classrooms should be turned into gay saunas. This is about homosexual practice in junior schools. The idiots who repealed Section 28 should consider that this is where it has got them.'

Project leader Dr Elizabeth Atkinson said the seminar had no connection with No Outsiders work in classrooms. 'The seminar is part of a long-standing academic debate and has nothing to do with schools,' she said. 'It has no connection with sex education.'

Section 28, the law which banned the promotion of homosexuality in state schools, was repealed five years ago. Current guidance on sex education says it should not promote sexual orientation or sexual activity.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

www.dailymail.co.uk...

This is truly disturbing on so many levels. At such an early stage, they want to sexualise & introduce children to the pleasures of sex, when they can barely make sense of the world or even read. I can't imagine what they're going to come up with next. I'm curious to what everyone else thinks about this.



Gay Fairy Tales for British Pupils
Homosexual kings, lesbian mothers and gay penguins -- these are the protagonists of a new type of schoolbook for British children. A pilot scheme run at elementary schools aims to raise sexually-tolerant students -- their parents are not amused.

Once upon a time a prince was looking for a suitable queen to be. He was introduced to one princess, two princesses … and fell in love with another prince. They married each other in a dream wedding and lived together happily ever after. Sounds like an underground gay comic? It isn't -- the text in question is a schoolbook.


www.spiegel.de...

www.nooutsiders.sunderland.ac.uk...

en.wikipedia.org...
www.esrc.ac.uk...

Welcome to the world that Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Peter Mandelson, David Miliband and all of those MPs who voted to repeal section 28 have foist upon us and our children.


Section 28
en.wikipedia.org...

Making Sex a Sacred Pleasure
www.partnershipway.org...

[edit on 16-9-2008 by kindred]




posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 08:18 PM
link   
I have no problem with gay people, I have gay friends and I have no problems with what two (or more
) consenting adults do in their own time.

I DO however have a problem with homosexuality being promoted left right and centre to school kids.

Schools should not be educating about something that a small fraction of kids will actually end up doing and promoting the behavior. What happens when the possibility of future population crashes arises, due to not sustaining itself in regards to the likely increase in number of homosexual relationships? What say it becomes a fad to be gay?

Come on guys... abc and 123 in schools please. Not more propaganda.

[edit on 16/9/08 by GhostR1der]



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 08:20 PM
link   
To me this all reeks of institutionalized sexual predation. It is well known that there is a high number of sexual predators in government and religious institutions, I think this topic is an illustration of a depraved queer agenda.

Sexual education of any detailed kind to a preteen is to be avoided, because their innocence, or lack of hormonal development for you left brain types, should be protected.

If a measure or policy like the one mentioned is aproved it's time for a revolution.



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 08:31 PM
link   
Does anyone remember the study the AMA had about the 'benefits' of child molestation? 1999. I do!
Prevent abuse now

Backing away from a controversial article that had said child molestation with "willing" children may not be harmful, and may, in some cases, even be beneficial, the American Psychological Association unveiled Wednesday a resolution condemning all "sexual relations between children and adults."

"After much pressure, the APA has begun to undo the damage wrought by its publication of a badly conceived article that has been hailed by such groups as the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)," said FRC's Chief Spokesperson Janet Parshall. "It's a good first step, but now the APA needs to root out the pro-pedophilic academicians who are trying to normalize child abuse. And the APA should write to NAMBLA and strongly urge them not to use this article as justification for molesting young boys."

"NAMBLA should stop celebrating and touting this trashed study as justification for their perverse sexual desires for young boys," said FRC Senior Director of Legal Policy Jan LaRue. "We especially appreciate that the APA's general counsel is preparing amicus brief materials that could be adapted for use in any court of law to challenge any efforts to use the data in this or any other study to justify, condone, or normalize sexual interactions of any sort between children and adults. This has tremendous legal significance."

In his letter, Dr. Fowler, who had earlier defended the article on national television as "a good study," now acknowledges that the article is "inflammatory" and includes opinions "inconsistent" with APA's policy on child protection issues. He admits that APA "failed" to "evaluate the article based on its potential for misinforming the public policy process."


There's some crazy stuff we should be watching out for!



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 10:09 PM
link   
reply to post by kindred
 



The AMERICAN FREE PRESS did an article on the GOVERNATOR

who also was in support of this incredible assault on our children!

Who the hell do these people think they are?

Our fearless leaders seem to have more in common with a TROJAN HORSE than a thinking, human being, hired to look out for the interests of "the people".

I suppose our world will have to cave in on people before they wake up and smell the coffee, or is that coffin?

The MSM is also as useless as teats on a bull and a major contributor to much the darkness of our unconscious fellow Americans.






posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 10:13 PM
link   
How some sicko researchers are given a chance to promote such crap is beyond my thinking.

Pedophile Researchers. Sick #

pervs

This is insulting to me. Its a good thing my children are grown up.


As far as my grandchildren? I'd show them a very violent Cuban in one of those little classrooms- i'd kick the teachers ars.


[edit on 16-9-2008 by dgtempe]



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Oh snap, the UK is trying to turn the population gay in order to reduce the populationz!



posted on Sep, 16 2008 @ 10:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by logician magician
Oh snap, the UK is trying to turn the population gay in order to reduce the populationz!


Ha... This is kind of the direction that I was thinking, when I seen it, I thought "Sounds like some kind of twisted population control effort"...



posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Yeh sure...school is for learning the 'normal' things like maths....not homosexuality.

But then don't teach them about straight relationships either... I did sex education at junior school...and it only covred straight relationships...equal teaching of sexualities. Or none at all.



posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 10:08 PM
link   
reply to post by dgtempe
 


Bless you Dgtempe

Yeah, I just about lost my mind when they explained to me that in the event of a disaster my children would be "moved to an undisclosed location"

If they put my kids in a room and teach them the pleasures of Gay Sex I will develop a severe set of issues that won't end with some bitchy teachers aid telling me my comments are "innapropriate"



posted on Sep, 27 2008 @ 08:51 AM
link   
reply to post by umbr45
 


My sex ed class was about sexual reproduction and the diseases associated with it. While I think it's a shame we didn't just have a full biology course, homosexual intercourse doesn't fit into the strict biological definition of sex and if the only things that can be derived from it are orgasms and diseases then I don't think schools should be teaching that.



posted on Sep, 27 2008 @ 08:26 PM
link   
I think this has a thread already in Breaking News which "Debunked" this as a study actually aimed at reducing bullying....




top topics



 
2

log in

join