It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Also, I guess blind people had no past lives, or they were always blind, because they dream predominately in sound and touch. That goes for all of those with sense defects, etc.
This article provides a critique of a recent inaccurate claim that the congenitally blind literally "see" in their dreams, which flies in the face of findings that were established in 3 careful previous studies. It first shows how this claim arose through a blurring of the distinction between actual seeing through the visual system and imagery that preserves spatial and metric properties without specific reliance on the visual system. It then discusses the 3 mistaken reasons for this blurring. This correction is important beyond the specific issue of seeing in dreams because the original findings lend important support for a cognitive theory of dreaming by showing that the imagery necessary for dreaming develops between ages 4 and 7.
[snip]
the authors reported that blind dreamers can draw the scenes and figures in the dream as well as can sighted people who have their eyes closed while they are drawing. On the basis of this evidence, they concluded that blind people must experience visual imagery in the dream.
psych.ucsc.edu...
Three careful sleep laboratory studies and at least one rigorous study of home dream reports have shown that congenitally blind dreamers and those who became blind in infancy do not have visual imagery in their dreams, whereas those blinded in adolescence or young adulthood often retain visual mental imagery in their waking life and in their dreams. These controlled experiments confirm what has been reported in a number of earlier self-report studies reviewed by Kirtley (1975), who concluded on the basis of his extensive appraisal that individuals blinded before the age of about 5 report no visual imagery in dreams as adults, whereas those blinded after about the age of 7 are likely to retain visual imagery in dreaming.
It is rather surprising that the findings on the lack of visual mental imagery in the dreams of congenitally blind individuals have been challenged in a recent home-report, polysomnographical study in which the authors concluded that "the congenitally blind have visual content in their dreams" (Bértolo et al., 2003, p. 277). However, Bértolo et al. have used the terms visual image and visual content in a way that is not consistent with previous studies, and they have drawn inappropriate conclusions from the fact that the congenitally blind can draw images of their dream content. They also have misapplied a system of content analysis. Because their new claim has implications for a cognitive theory of dreaming, it is the purpose of this brief article to show that their results are in fact consistent with the earlier studies and do not support conclusions that congenitally blind people can "see" in dreaming or waking imagery.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
If you're going to take one dream and state it as absolute proof for a past life, then you must certainly look at all dreams the same way.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
I'm referring to those who have been blind their entire lives, obviously. Read the whole article.
My emphasis.
The potential confusion is not present in dream reports of individuals who are visually impaired from birth but who retain some ability to see visual characteristics such as brightness and color and are able to match waking visual experience to dreaming visual experience. These individuals universally report that visual images in their dreams appear to them as they would in waking life. They can see things in dreams with no more clarity or detail than they could see in wakefulness, yet they know the details of the dream environment through the integration of information from other sensory systems. Uniquely visual imagery is dependent on uniquely visual experience. We therefore strongly believe that the term visual imagery should be reserved for imagery that is phenomenologically similar to objects seen with one's eyes, the only sensory receptors capable of receiving and encoding the information conveyed exclusively in light waves.
psych.ucsc.edu...
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
Hoo-ray! Yaaaay!
Those born totally blind or who lost all of their sight very early in childhood usually have little or no visual imagery, but show the same detailed attention to sound, smell, touch, and taste that they do in waking life.
psych.ucsc.edu...
We therefore strongly believe that the term visual imagery should be reserved for imagery that is phenomenologically similar to objects seen with one's eyes, the only sensory receptors capable of receiving and encoding the information conveyed exclusively in light waves.
psych.ucsc.edu...
Originally posted by masqua
(attitude?)
In the corner where you stand;
Those born totally blind or who lost all of their sight very early in childhood usually have little or no visual imagery, but show the same detailed attention to sound, smell, touch, and taste that they do in waking life.
psych.ucsc.edu...
Sight is only ONE of the senses.
The others are all there... and, with this they DO dream.
So these people, blind from birth can also know people and can dream of their relationship to them.
Not knowing visual imagery does not preclude dreams of past lives. I wonder if there was ever a study done on a large scale, looking for instances of visual imagery in the congenitally blind?
We therefore strongly believe that the term visual imagery should be reserved for imagery that is phenomenologically similar to objects seen with one's eyes, the only sensory receptors capable of receiving and encoding the information conveyed exclusively in light waves.
psych.ucsc.edu...
Can we get back to the ego now?
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
You can't even follow along.
This isn't hard.
Do you have any idea of what you are doing?
Do you like being wrong or is it just a past time?
So to make a long conversation short.
The congenitally blind do not dream in visual images.
Therefore their past lives must be limited to blind people since it is absolute that through dreams we are revealed knowledge of past lives.
But, pick and choose when and where convenient.
If your dream doesn't seem to make sense, just say it wasn't a part of the collective consciousness
and wa-la!
You can have as many past lives as you'd like!
There's a fine line between objectivity and subjective insanity.
You've crossed it and become delusional about it, and illogically so.
Oh, my... now I'm insane according to you. Are you qualified to make that diagnosis?
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
It's really too bad that we can't ignore moderators.
If I could I would. I'll just have to manually ignore the illogical non-sense from now on.
And yes, you're a lost cause.
Originally posted by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
reply to post by stove167
I have NO beliefs. .
Originally posted by OmniVersal
Since the ego works so well in society (by design I suspect) it becomes intertwined with our personality to the point where we can't see the difference. We then identify with this way of thinking. We think it is who we are.
Ego is the movement of the mind toward objects of perception in the form of grasping, and away from objects in the form of aversion. This fundamentally is all the ego is. This movement of grasping and aversion gives rise to a sense of a separate "me," and in turn the sense of "me" strengthens itself this way. It is this continuous loop of causation that tricks consciousness into a trance of identification. Identification with what? Identification with the continuous loop of suffering. After all, who is suffering? The "me" is suffering. And who is this me? It is nothing more than a sense of self caused by identification with grasping and aversion. You see, it's all a creation of the mind, an endless movie, a terrible dream. Don't try to change the dream, because trying to change it is just another movement in the dream. Look at the dream. Be aware of the dream. That awareness is It. Become more interested in the awareness of the dream than in the dream itself. What is that awareness? Who is that awareness? Don't go spouting out an answer, just be the answer. Be It.
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by OmniVersal
Since the ego works so well in society (by design I suspect) it becomes intertwined with our personality to the point where we can't see the difference. We then identify with this way of thinking. We think it is who we are.
I agree with this statement.
Our ego evolves through interaction with the society around us. A feral child, for instance, living their formative years among wild animals, will not know speech nor social mores.
But, is the ego at birth truly without ANY personality AT ALL?
Ego is a love-denying obsession with separation, narcissism, and self-concern." --Andrew Cohen
That is to say, you get your sense of who you are from things that ultimately have nothing to do with who you are: your social role, possessions, externl appearance, successes and failures, belief systems, and so on. This false, mind-made self, the ego, feels vulnerable, insecure, and is always seeking new things to identify with to give it a feeling that it exists. But nothing is ever enough to give it lasting fulfillment. Its fear remains; its sense of lack and needineess remains." ---Eckhart Tolle
It is the ego, the sum total of all our defects, that separates us from our spiritual self and causes all our suffering. The ego ensnares our consciousness - the Divine Spark within each of us - in a web of illusion that prevents us from comprehending our true nature and identity." - Samael Aun Weor