It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pentothal
What is reality? It depends what you are observing it with.
If you observe it then you change it.
You become part of the process.
Therefore you are observing part of yourself.
Originally posted by Epsillion70
Believe--Perceive--Experience.
The original WTBDWK was made for a theatrical experience of under two hours. With these new expanded versions, the filmmakers were finally able to include all the topics as originally intended. The completed picture presents all the elements that are intrinsic to the worldview put forth in BLEEP. Topics such as Quantum Entanglement, the Double Slit Experiment, Healing and the Cell, the split and re-unification of spirit and science - all are addressed in the detail required to tell the story. Hopefully they stimulate the viewer to seek further explorations. It may be the definitive BLEEP, but it is not the last word – it’s the final beginning.
At the same time, all beings and things also belong to the ultimate dimension, the dimension of reality that is not subject to notions of space and time, birth and death, coming and going. A wave is a wave but at the same time it is water. The wave does not have to die in order to become water; it is already water right in the present moment. We don't speak of water in terms of being or nonbeing, coming and going - water is always water. To talk about a wave, we need these notions: the wave arises and passes away; it comes from somewhere or has gone somewhere; the wave has a beginning and an end; it is high or low, more of less beautiful than other waves; the wave is subject to birth and death. None of these distinctions can be applied to the wave in its ultimate dimension as water. In fact, you cannot separate the wave from its ultimate dimension.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
What if you were really just a piece of AI in a advanced game? Able to think and make decisions. What if this was the Matrix?
Originally posted by SteveR
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
The illusion is actually a reflection, but without one of the two showing proof.
All these factors and more will push his accuracy to reality.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
But do we agree there is limitations to our preset day conscious abilities in these bodies?
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I guess my feelings are there is a reason for our limited expansion of mind, whilst we're incarnated in this special place (Earth).
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
If we knew all there is to know, what would that change about our physical limitations?
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
eventually we will be able to actualize our spirit's tool (ie telepathy, telekinesis) in the form
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
We have a cap on what these bodies can do, and while we may be able to examine the esoteric, we will always be confined by our physical limitations. Forcing the unattainable to seem illusionary.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
What if it was simply defined as reality is what we pay attention to long enough to materialize it.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Pay attention long enough, and you can understand more about your limitations here.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
However, some things we can pay attention for years and never have a better understanding a full concept (ie who is GOD?).
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I was considering the ramifications if there was that "restriction" aspect to humanity.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
The walls we have all created erroneously are the only things standing in our way.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
I could sway both ways actually, with neither having definitive assurances.
So I'm lazy because I came to another conclusion? Because I disagree with you, I have to do more research?
Yes having said that, why judge my interpretation in the first place.?
I just think that the knowledge you claim to have that enables you to judge my interpretation as false, would be same knowledge that would enable you to explain why it is wrong.
I have watched it more than once, so please don't tell me what is and is not in there.
That's almost like me saying you shouldn't open your mouth until you fully understand and grasp what your talking about.