It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MoonMine
The lack of any decent responses to this is puzzling.
Originally posted by Nohup
Consider this another obligatory "it's just rocks" post.
Originally posted by ziggystar60
And to Nohup:
I suggest that you take the time to read the post made by CX in this thread. There is a distinct different between your post and that one, and perhaps you will be able to figure out just what this difference is?
A little hint for you: Attitude...
Originally posted by zorgon
A) what type of rock
B) what type of formation
C) what caused that 'rock' to appear as it does [afterall geology follows rules you know, even on Mars]
To say "it's just rocks" is probably the most singularly ignorant statement anyone could make
Originally posted by merka
Now if we only had it in high res footage...
Originally posted by zorgon
Well your obligatory "it's just rocks" posts might have some validity if you could actually qualify them with..
A) what type of rock
B) what type of formation
C) what caused that 'rock' to appear as it does [afterall geology follows rules you know, even on Mars]
To say "it's just rocks" is probably the most singularly ignorant statement anyone could make
Originally posted by thrashee it's why you're pouring over hundreds of NASA images looking for The One,
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by thrashee it's why you're pouring over hundreds of NASA images looking for The One,
Actually I am busy with the new tapes found in a Mcdonald's And if I find THE one CNN gets first dibs...
Silly Lemming...
Originally posted by SideWynder
My point being, is that Science has not yet explained in every detail how the earth and moon came to be.. let alone life, nor has it figured out the rest of the solar system, let alone the universe, What we have are some generally accepted "theories" that although they seem to explain alot, they are still "theories" not "absolute truths"
So If someone has a theory that there are artificial structures on the moon and they post it, fine, If all I see is geological formations, fine, at least we are "Searching"... Without absolute proof of one theory or another, there is always the possibility that either could be correct, or that both could be. or possibly, neither..
Originally posted by SideWynder
Probably bad examples, but hopefully my point is comming accross..
And yes, I know that restating your position time after time,especially on the same pics gets irritating... but, at least give the op, a chance to express his/her/its.. beliefs, and then we can discuss the pros and cons of them, and try to figure out wich scenario is more likely..This is not directed soley at you Thrashee, just a "blanket" request to all who may wish to reply to the op's thread..