White House missing up to 225 days of e-mail, page
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 21-8-2008 @ 05:29 AM by wolf241e

White House missing up to 225 days of e-mail


www.msnbc.msn.com
WASHINGTON - The White House is missing as many as 225 days of e-mail dating back to 2003 and there is little if any likelihood a recovery effort will be completed by the time the Bush administration leaves office, according to an internal White House draft document obtained by The Associated Press.

The nine-page outline of the White House's e-mail problems invites companies to bid on a project to recover the missing electronic messages.

The work would be carried out through April 19, 2009, according to the Office of Administration request for contractors' proposals, which was dated June 20.
(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Breaking News Forum Submission Guidelines – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 21/8/2008 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 06:08 AM by beezwaxes
reply to post by camain


That would be if they really wanted to recover them. I of course don't know all the why and how's but, my guess would be something a little different than what was lost will be recovered if it makes anyone that fled extradition or the like look bad.
A job for a haliburton subsidiary no doubt.
This is a conspiracy site after all


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 06:31 AM by scepticsRus
reply to post by camain



When you delete a document it really only removes the index from the disk FAT so that the data that the index pointed to can be re-used. If its been a few years since the emails went missing the blocks of data that originally held the email would have been written over many many times and would make them unrecoverable.


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 07:15 AM by wolf241e
reply to post by JSR



My apologies to the headline police.

Thought that adding the first words to the title were within guidelines of editorial latitude.

And just for the record, it was "Here's a real shocker".

Have a nice day.


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 08:20 AM by JSR
reply to post by wolf241e



ok then.
as long as everyone agrees with the context of the "editorial latitude" being taken, then i suppose i have no beef here.

im sorry.

---------------------on topic-----------------

although i can see why people want to know what was in every email generated, i dont agree that email ( a basic communication somtimes ) between staff should be public domain anyway.

unless, there is already a case or investigation ongoing that may require the contents of the emails. there is no case, that i know of, that would require this. i could be wrong about that though.

but to search through email to find reason to begin a case is not IMO a good idea.

------------------------edit-----------------------

after re-reading the article, i do see in fact there is an investigation ongoing.


the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the criminal probe into the disclosure that Valerie Plame had worked for the CIA.


I thought that that was finished though. oh well.

like an earlier poster stated, it is unlikely that the barak admini...oops, I mean the next administration will peruse this further.


[edit on 21-8-2008 by JSR]

[edit on 21-8-2008 by JSR]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^