posted on Mar, 15 2004 @ 02:01 PM
well, judging by today's events it looks like there's gonna be one less member in that coalition due to Spain's elections.
We can see from this how fast word spreads and how easy it is to influence an entire nation.
Bombs go off in the train system in Spain. Messages are sent out saying Spain was attacked because of it's support for the US led war on terror.
Not-Coincedentally Spain's elections are right afterwards and the PM is voted out in favor of someone who will most likely not have a role in any war
on terror.
Nada, I don't believe war and death are ever good things. I don't believe that it's healthy for the people of a nation to live in a situation that
is unstable in which anything can happen either.
What I don't understand though is why people have become so preoccupied with theories as to who caused this Iraq conflict that they fail to realize
what happened. Clearly, none of you can deny the fact that Saddam was far from someone you'd want to live under. The question of what brought us
there is a valid one... I agree... but letting it outweigh the importance of what happened there is just wrong. Previously everyone was saying how
Bush came into office and immediately wanted to get rid of Hussein to avenge the assasination attempt on his father and all sorts of other things.
Now suddenly it's Israel, according to the embarassingly biased opinion on libertyforum. I say embarassing because as someone who does a small
amount of writing it pains me to see people writing things to be considered fact and having no evidence whatsoever. But the fact remains whoever it
may be that caused the war in Iraq really didn't do a bad thing did they?
[Edited on 3-15-2004 by Djarums]