I've seen temperature data recorded by the Met Office for a region of the UK, covering from the 40s to the present.
It shows that for a rise in CO2 levels, the trend has been for *COOLING*.
I've no links to hand right now, but for sure it exposes the head of the Met Office as someone with an agenda.
I'm no scientist, but I know how to read a graph, and it was definitely on a downwards trend.
People lie, data (generally) doesn't (unless it has been tampered with, fabricated, or comes from the IPCC).
It's BS. Just look at the way the heads of the nation carry on as if there is no issue. Hell - look at Al Gore! His energy use is phenomenal. Just
what the hell does he do at his house?!
HYPOCRITES - the lot of them!
WHY? Because there ISN'T A PROBLEM AND THEY KNOW IT!!!
Annually human activities produce about 100 times as much CO2 as that from all annual volcanic eruptions
Climatologists pro- man-made GW/AGW/whatever keep using the logical fallacy.
Once thing that was the trend about a year ago was to keep equating the chucking out of CO2 by fossile fuels to the smog problems of the past.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING! Thick billowing pollution is NOT CO2!
CO2 is a colorless, odorless gas (just in case you missed that back in the 3rd grade).
For all their crap spoken about how much more CO2 we chuck out compared with Volcanoes (fully expecting you to picture dark skies and lots of clouds
of ASH), CO2 still comprises only 0.035% of the total composition of the ENTIRE ATMOSPHERE!
Look at the number - it's tiny, and it accounts for ALL the CO2 in the air!!
Anyone who can't see the problem with their math needs to go back to high school and re-study maths, physics, and statistics.
The maths so they can actually read charts and realize the craziness of the claims regarding volumes, physics (and chemistry) so they can understand
the composition of the atmosphere etc.., and statistics, so they know just how much figures can be manipulated to say anything you want them to
The world is being taken for a fool, and so far, the con is working.
Read this: news.bbc.co.uk...
Some more facts for you:
The UK (in total, all sources, both man-made and natural) produces 2% of the entire worlds output of CO2.
China has exceeded that in just one years worth of growth!
Again, it is a fallacy that somewhere like the UK, even if we cut all sources of CO2 to zero, could actually make a dent.
This alone should demonstrate the mathematical deficiency of both the UK populous at large, the UK Government and the IPCC.
The figures don't stand, any way you look at them. How is the poor little UK cutting it's CO2 to zero (all sources) going to make any difference? IT
There is now talk of putting solar panels in the Sahara Desert to power the whole of Europe from. What environmental impact is that going to have on
the Sahara? You're going to put it in the shade!!
What impact is reflecting light back into space over that area going to have on the worlds climate? It WILL result in changed weather patterns by its
They talk of "climate change", yet they miss every other aspect of the environment in coming up with proposals.
There are inefficiencies in power transmission. The solar technology itself is inefficient. What is the environmental cost of production and building
such a system? My favorite: how much CO2 will be produced building them?
Someone on page one was saying we should consider all the methane produced from cows. What next - are we going to eradicate the cow population because
of these lies? Why not exterminate all forms of CO2 producing life? Yeah - that's good for the environment.
Whilst people are so distracted by the lies spun by these idiots with agendas, they're missing that we ARE the environment! You poison me, you're
poisoning the environment!
Ask yourself: what IS the environment? Answer: It encompasses everything.
If you make a place inhospitable to life, you just polluted a part of the ENVIRONMENT, eve nif nothing is apparently growing there!!!
Can't people see what rubbish it all is? WAKE UP! This has to be THE greatest deception pulled on the population of the WORLD in HISTORY!
I liken it to the guy stood with the board that says "THE WORLD IS NIGH!", only everyone believes it instead of calling him insane and walking
OIL is the problem. GW is the distraction. They've also seen that they can make a fortune ripping us off.
Have you also noticed how in that article they talk of the "rich" countries having to be the ones who tackle "climate change" for the sake of the
poor? They're using emotional blackmail to an extent never seen before, and the sheeple are falling for it hook line and sinker.
The "rich" are the ones tackling it because they're the ones with the money.
You can't get from the poor what they don't have.
Kyoto was a joke - they restricted everyones industrial capacity in the name of cutting CO2 (at great expense, too), yet it actually permitted China
to keep on polluting at record levels until 2012! Kind of negates any savings.
Of course, all this action is based on the false science that CO2 is *the* cause of global warming (if you believe the doomsday people).
Just how the hell do you explain the massive rise in temperature since the last ice-age? If we were to believe scientists from the IPCC on how the
climate worked, technically the earth should have never recovered from it because of so much heat energy being reflected back into space, thus keeping
the earth permanently cool.
People are so stupid, they miss the obvious - THAT WHICH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM.
The IPCC have an agenda, governments have an agenda. They're LYING, and the Sheeple have fallen for it.
Great title! Starred and flagged!
[edit on 22-7-2008 by mirageofdeceit]