Astronaut Edgar Mitchell & The Pentagon Briefing

I am having to post anonymously because I can't get your software to recognise me!

Mitchell Speaks Out About Wilson's Denial

bilderbergAstronaut Edgar Mitchell has revealed to me what he believes
is the reason that retired Admiral Thomas Wilson is now denying a claim that
he was refused access to UFO information.

His comments follow extensive media coverage of an interview he gave on a UK radio station in which he claimed the UFO cover-up, the Roswell crash and alien life, is real.
See some of that media coverage here:
www.paradigmresearchgroup.org...

This is turn sparked off an article by journalist Billy Cox here: tiny.cc...
in which he writes of a meeting between Mitchell and the Admiral who promised to delve deeper into UFO secrets - but is now denying he took any action or that he was refused access to information.

Subsequently there were further revelations by UFO author and researcher Richard Dolan here :www.ufodigest.com...


In his email interview with me, Dr Mitchell, explained why he thought the Admiral was now denying further probing the UFO topic.

He referred me to an article in Jane's Defence Weekly entitled
"Pentagon's Hidden Budget" by defense analyst Bill Sweetman
in which he discusses Special Access Programs in great
detail. This report is here:
www.janes.com...

Dr Mitchell points to a quote from that article:

"An unacknowledged SAP - a black program - is a program
which is
considered so sensitive that the fact of its existence is a
'core secret', defined in USAF regulations as 'any item,
progress,
strategy or element of information, the compromise of which
would
result in unrecoverable failure'. In other words, revealing
the
existence of a black program would undermine its military
value."

Dr Mitchell told me: "The UFO program that the admiral
sought would
be in this category. Thus by law he would be required to
deny the
existence of such a program. For a core secret SAP, even a
"no comment" would be a breach of security."

Dr Mitchell believes that the Billy Cox report above, together
with
the Jane's article "tells it all".

He writes: "They somewhat go together and validate the
entire
episode."

He adds: "This SAP designation is the reason it is so
difficult to get
any truthful information to the public. NO INFORMATION is
exempt
from containment"

I understand Dr Mitchell has no wish to fan any flames of
conflict
between he and Admiral Wilson who is, as he put it, "caught
in the
political security rules dilemma as is anyone with inside
knowledge
whether they like it or not."

Dr Mitchell has given full permission for me to post his
comments.
He said: "The more people and media get to see this, the sooner we
can
break open the alien visitation issue."

Dave Haith
___________________________________
Email address: [email protected]

I watched the ST videos a number of times once they came out and became popular enough to hit youtube etc

I watched these things... how many...TONS of UFOs?

space ships? No, they all looked the same but differed in size (distance relation possibly) but they are just unidentified, not flying saucers

it is odd that no one has said that they look like living creatures swimming around in space, because this is what they made me think of

similar to plankton in the oceans

we look deep in the oceans and find life in places we deemed uninhabitable for life, and again in the bacteria in the mantle of the earth

why not life in space...specially around planets where all those gaseous remnants are to feed on

I think life in the universe has been under our noses all the time

life is everywhere

Originally posted by _Heretic
it is odd that no one has said that they look like living creatures swimming around in space, because this is what they made me think of

You are wrong; there was somebody who said that, you can read it here.

reply to post by zorgon

Originally posted by spacevisitor

Originally posted by _Heretic
it is odd that no one has said that they look like living creatures swimming around in space, because this is what they made me think of

You are wrong; there was somebody who said that, you can read it here.

reply to post by zorgon

 

thx for pointing me in that direction spacevisitor, although I am not going to try and explain away what they are, or what exactly they eat, or well...ANYTHING..i simply dont know and there isn't enough correlation to aptly say one way or the other

but they do move like living things IMHO

and it is good to see I am not alone in my thinking

reply to post by secretnasaman


I personally don't see anything special on that video either, And I believe in UFO's. Shouldn't a believer have very high standards on what they consider to be "good" video evidence?

After having seen videos of structured craft maneuvering intelligently and rapidly, out of focus images of something distant moving in what appears to be a ballistic (inertial) trajectory does not seem very exciting.

-arr